|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: b4, d4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h4, h6, h11.Visual evaluation of the returned impactor exhibited signs of repeated use and was confirmed to be fractured into two (2) pieces.Fracture surface artifacts in the form of hackle marks and river lines were consistent with overload failure.The device history records were reviewed and no discrepancies were identified.A definitive root cause could not be determined with the information provided.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|