|
|
| Catalog Number |
PDP494G |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/25/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an ent procedure on (b)(6) 2025 and suture was used.It was reported by a sales rep that, during an unknown ent (eyes, nose, and throat) surgery, when using the product, the tip of the needle was broken, and it fell into the surgical field.The fallen needle tip was retrieved and was not left inside the body.A new product was taken out, and the suturing was completed without any problems.It was not a control release needle.Additional suture was performed to complete the case.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 10/17/2025 this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information was requested the following was obtained: - please provide the lot number.Unk.- please perform and document the follow up attempt for product return.Please document the shipment tracking number in notes or rmao sections.The device has been received at sukagawa and will be shipped.Please check rmao.Tracking number: (b)(4).- provide the source or name and title of external person providing answers to follow-up (external person submitting answers to sales rep or loc/bq).(b)(6).The following information was reported: -there was no need to search using x-rays or ct scans for needle fragments when occurred the needle breakage.-in addition, since the product was used for dermal sutures, it was possible to observe the wound under direct vision.-no additional procedures such as tissue resection were performed when extracted.-the patient's condition is currently improving steadily.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 12/17/2025.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: d9, h3, h6.H3 investigational summary: the product received for analysis was pdp494g.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A failed suture needle, was submitted for fractographic evaluation on october 20, 2025.The component was identified as product code pdp494g.It was requested that hsa assess the fracture mode of the failure.A fracture was observed at the suture attachment of the needle.The needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surfaces was examined for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.This was a ductile fracture.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|