| Model Number |
PCB00 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Posterior Capsule Opacification (4807)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after bilateral implantation of the preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (iol), the patient experienced bilateral posterior capsule opacification (pco) requiring yttrium aluminum garnet (yag) surgical intervention in 2023.The yag procedure was successful in the left eye (os).However, the right eye (od), while yag was initially successful, regrew the epithelial cells on the posterior of the iol a further two times in 2024 and 2025, each times requiring yag intervention.No further information was provided.This report is for the lens implanted in the right eye (od).A separate report is being submitted for the other eye.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a2, a3, a4 and a5: per regulation eu 2016/679 (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Section b3 - date of event: unknown, as information was requested but not provided.Year known 2023, 2024 and august 2025.Section d6b - explant date: n/a - lens remains implanted, therefore not explanted section e1 - telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of this review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information.However, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information and corrected data upon further review, it was noted that section h3 and section h6 were addressed inappropriately in the initial mdr report as device evaluation was performed.This supplemental filing is to correct the following sections and provide an updated manufacturer narrative: section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Section h6 - type of investigation: 3331.Section h6 - type of investigation: 4109.Section h6 - investigation findings: 213.Device evaluation: product testing could not be performed since the device was not returned for evaluation (lens remains implanted).Therefore, the reported issue could not be verified, and no product quality deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no additional complaints were received for this po.No escalation required.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, no product deficiency or product malfunction were found.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|