|
Corrective data: on block b1, the adverse event/product problem field initially reported was ¿product problem¿.In follow-up report 1, this is updated to ¿adverse event / product problem¿.Additional manufacturer narrative: (4117) the device is not accessible as it remained implanted in the patient, therefore no analysis could be performed.(4111) the following additional information were received from the getinge sales representative : procedural information: - procedure performed: graft replacement.- indication for surgery: aortic aneurysm.- impact on the procedural outcome: none.- consequence for the patient: none.- describe the bleeding: local.- patient¿s medication: hypotensive drugs.- amount of blood loss: about 200cc.- where was the bleeding noted: along a suture line/anastomosis.- what actions were taken to stop the bleeding: additional sutures.- the extensive bleeding made hemostasis difficult.- postoperative drainage was extensive.- the tube removal time was long.Medical history: hypertension.The graft was not explanted and not available for investigation.They also indicated that there is no further information for this complaint.(4112/213) the case and its investigation have been reviewed by the medical affairs department; however, despite repeated attempts to obtain additional information from the reporting surgeon, only limited information was available, leading to the following conclusion: "this is a complaint regarding an intergard woven aortic arch implanted in mianyang sichuan, china on (b)(6) 2025.It was reported that a patient bled approximately 200 cc from one of the branches of the aortic arch device, along the suture line.Additional sutures were placed to achieve hemostasis.Requests for additional information were not successful.Considering the limited amount of information provided it is difficult to understand if there were issues with the graft, the procedure or the patient.The current status of the patient is unknown." (4110) occurrence of bleeding events are reviewed monthly during quality meeting.In dec 2025, the bleeding events rates on intergard standard products were within the maximum anticipated by the product risk assessment.(4315) due to the limited information provided, no conclusion can be drawn on the exact origin of the event.Nevertheless, the investigation findings suggest that the device was not defective at the time of manufacturing.(22) to be noted that bleeding is an undesirable side-effect as indicated in the current product instructions for use, in the "undesirable side-effects" section.
|