| Model Number |
AR40E |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/07/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a3b, a4, and a5 (race): information was requested but it is unknown/ not provided.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: n/a, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: n/a, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure section e1 - telephone number: (b)(6).Device evaluation: product testing could not be performed since the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, the reported issue could not be verified, and no product quality deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no additional complaints were received for this po.No escalation required.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a cataract surgery a capsule rupture occurred requiring an anterior vitrectomy.A sensar 3-piece intraocular lens (iol) was implanted in the patient's right eye.Despite being correctly assembled in the cartridge, the haptic of the lens was found to be broken.The lens was replaced during the same surgical procedure with another lens of identical characteristics.The patient was reported to be in good postoperative condition, and no additional medication beyond the standard of care was administered.No further medical or surgical interventions were planned.No further information provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on jan 26, 2026.Section h3.Device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned revealing damage and a tear at the edge.A haptic was observed to be detached.The lens was forwarded to the manufacturing site for haptic drill hole measurement and was found to be within specifications.The complaint issue "haptic damage" was not identified during product evaluation.The observed "haptic detached" is similar to the reported complaint issue.However, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|