|
W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE® EXCLUDER® CONFORMABLE AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
CXT231412 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Aneurysm (1708)
|
| Date of Event |
09/23/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
W.L.Gore & associates, inc.(gore) is submitting this report to comply with 21 c.F.R.Part 803, the medical device reporting regulation.This report is based upon information obtained by gore, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Blank fields present on this report include required fields and fields determined to be not applicable.Blank required fields indicate that the information was not provided, was deemed unavailable or was not applicable.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, gore, or its associates that the device, gore or its associates caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute a legal admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any defects or has malfunctioned, as defined from a legal standpoint.These words are included in the report and are fixed items for selection created by the fda, to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of reporting pursuant to part 803.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The following was reported: on (b)(6) 2025, the patient was implanted with gore® excluder® conformable aaa endoprosthesis to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm.It was reported that after the first deployment line was pulled the device (proximal end) looked to be constrained at 70%.The physician attempted to reconstrain and release, positioning confirmed, that did not unconstrain the device.The physician ballooned the area, the device fully opened.There were no further issues, and the positioning of the device was good.The patient tolerated the procedure.Reportedly there were no anatomical constraints, no tortuosity, and no issues advancing the delivery catheter.The delivery catheter was destroyed at the hospital.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|