|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. RFB TRUEPASS SUTURE PASSER SELF-CAPTUR; ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
72203791F |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Unstable (1667)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/03/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during a shoulder arthroscopy, it was noticed that a rfb truepass suture passer self-captur spring on the tip became loose.The procedure was performed, after a delay greater than 30 min, using a similar s+n back-up product.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H11 h3, h6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation.However, an analysis of the customer provided image found two perspectives of the reported device.The product information can be seen, the ref and lot numbers matches the reported information.A close up to the distal tip can be seen, the upper side of the jaw shows a detached component.The failure is associated with a well-known failure mode that has been thoroughly investigated in prior complaints.No new information, trends, or patient impact were identified that would warrant further review.Based on the information available, there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The root cause of the reported event could not be determined since findings cannot lead to a clear cause of the reported event.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include forceful replacement of the tip protector, excessive pulling on the suture capture door, or wear over time.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|