|
|
| Catalog Number |
TSVTWH8 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Unspecified Infection (1930)
|
| Date of Event |
02/16/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4).A1: patient identifier: unknown / not provided.A2: age at time of the event: unknown / not provided.D10: concomitant medical product: tsvth10, imp, tsv, 3.7, 10, mtxf, mg, ha, lot: 1256318.G4: premarket identification pma/510(k) #: k133339.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The doctor reports that the dental implants located in dental positions number #33 & #36 failed due to an allergic reaction.The doctor reports in the per that the procedure was not concluded by placing another implant.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4).The following fields have been updated: b4: date of this report b5: describe event or problem d3: email adress d8-9: device service and availability g1: contact office - first/given name, last name and email address g1: contact office - manufacturer site - email address g3: date received by manufacturer g6: type of report h1: type of reportable event h2: follow up type h3: device evaluated by manufacturer h6: adverse event problem h10: additional narrative zimvie did not receive one (1) tsvtwh8, (imp, tsv, 4.7, 8, mtxf, mg, ha) for evaluation.Visual inspection could not be performed.The investigation has been performed based on the available information using the item number, device history record (dhr) review, and risk management file (rmf).Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number 1265602.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number 1265602 for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Review completed utilizing keywords: ¿dental : medical : allergic reaction¿ based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was patient factors.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction was not established.Without device receipt, the reported event is non-verifiable.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.At this time, the complaint investigation has been completed and the record will be closed.If additional information is received, the record will be re-opened for further evaluation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No further event information is available at the time of this report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No further event information is available at the time of this report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Zimvie complaint number: (b)(4).The following fields have been updated: h2: follow up type: corrected.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer: corrected.H10: additional narrative.Zimvie did not receive one (1) tsvtwh8, (imp, tsv, 4.7, 8, mtxf, mg, ha) for evaluation.Visual inspection could not be performed.The investigation has been performed based on the available information using the item number, device history record (dhr) review, and risk management file (rmf).Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number 1265602.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number 1265602 for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Review completed utilizing keywords: ¿dental: medical: allergic reaction¿ based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was patient factors.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction was not established.Without device receipt, the reported event is non-verifiable.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.At this time, the complaint investigation has been completed and the record will be closed.If additional information is received, the record will be re-opened for further evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|