| Catalog Number |
HAR9F |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Separation (1562); Failure to Read Input Signal (1581)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/08/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 10/27/2025.D4 batch #: unknown.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date, no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date, a supplemental medwatch will be sent: did the fragments generated fell off inside the patient? if yes, were they completely removed from the patient without additional intervention? what efforts were made to locate the pieces of the blade during the procedure? did the patient experience any adverse consequences due to this issue? attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformance were identified.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an unknown procedure the clamp was used under the usual conditions.During first use, a message is displayed: ¿release the pressure on the jaws¿.The surgeon puts two turns of the key back on the clamp and rests it on the patient's chest.When reusing it, the surgeon finds that the jaw is broken.Changing the device for another similar device.Lengthening the procedure.No patient consequence.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 11/3/2025.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: did the fragments generated fell off inside the patient? no.If yes, were they completely removed from the patient without additional intervention? not applicable.What efforts were made to locate the pieces of the blade during the procedure? not applicable.Corrected data: h6 health effect - impact code and medical device problem code.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 12/5/2025.D4 batch #: z7025x.Corrected data: h4.Investigation summary : the product was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.The device was returned with the distal tip of the blade broken off and not returned.The remaining blade portion was scratched and with evidence of contact with metal in or out of the operative field.During functional testing on gen11, an alert screen was displayed.A probable cause of the device stop activating and displaying an alert screen is blade damage.The manufacturing records were reviewed and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this batch.Probable causes of blade damage, including breakage, are external contact during pre-op or general use, blade contact with other devices, staples, or clips during the procedure, or using any means other than the blade wrench to attach or detach the blade.Once minor blade damage has occurred, subsequent activations may increase damage severity and can result in not passing the pre-run test followed by an alert screen, such as ¿tighten assembly¿, ¿blade error detected¿ or "relaxed pressure on blade" followed by a ¿replace instrument¿ screen later in the procedure, and continued usage can result in a broken blade.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch z7025x, and no non-conformances were identified.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 11/21/2025.The device upon which this medwatch is based has been received, however, the evaluation is not yet complete.Any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|