• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA20 A.PRECHAMBER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA20 A.PRECHAMBER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX441T
Medical Device Problem Codes Obstruction of Flow (2423); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 09/22/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shunt system (#fx441t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, the shunt system caused an unerdrainage and had adjustment difficulties.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2025.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.The complained product was sent to the manufacturer for investigation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Visual inspection: during the investigation, scratches on the outer housing of the progav 2.0 and a cut in the connecting catheter were determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the progav 2.0 has a blackage while the shuntassistant 2.0 is permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.Because the progav 2.0 is not permeable, a computer controlled test is not possible the results of the shuntassistant show that the valve operates within the specified tolerances in both positions.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is not adjustable.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function operates as expected; however, the breaking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.Results: based on our investigation results, we can determine blockage and non-adjustability in the progav 2.0.The deposits visible in the valve have led to functional impairments.Furthermore, we can determine visible deposits in the shuntassistant.The deposits did not affect the technical properties at the time of the examination.Deposits caused by natural substances found in the body, such as protein, blood, or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.Even small amounts of organic deposits can compromise the integrity of the valve.The examination of the returned item is complete with the preparation of this report.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA20 A.PRECHAMBER
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key23391093
Report Number3004721439-2025-00305
Device Sequence Number10015137
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906137465
UDI-Public4041906137465
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K161853
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 10/27/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/12/2023
Device Model NumberFX441T
Device Catalogue NumberFX441T
Device Lot Number20040062
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/01/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/01/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/27/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/04/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-