|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: contralateral removal mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a primary breast augmentation surgery with implantation of a 330cc mentor smooth round high profile saline breast implant prosthesis.Post-operatively, the patient was diagnosed with a deflated right implant using mammogram imaging.Multiple stable bilateral oil cysts were identified on the imaging report as well.As a result, the patient underwent bilateral exchange with mentor gel implants on (b)(6) 2025.This report is for the left breast prosthesis.
|