• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. ULTRAVERSE 014; PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. ULTRAVERSE 014; PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number U4150530
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/24/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
On (b)(6) 2025, prior to an angioplasty procedure using the ultraverse 014 pta balloon, the balloon allegedly disintegrated while prepping.It was further reported that fragments were detached and hanging from end of the catheter.The procedure was completed using another balloon.There was no patient contact.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause for the reported break could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.G3, h6 (method, result, conclusion) section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient prepped for an angioplasty procedure using the ultraverse 014 pta balloon.Prior to the procedure, the balloon allegedly disintegrated while prepping.It was further reported that the fragments were detached and hanging from the end of the catheter.The procedure was completed using another balloon.There was no patient contact.
 
Event or Problem Description
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient prepped for an angioplasty procedure using the ultraverse 014 pta balloon.Prior to the procedure, the balloon allegedly disintegrated while prepping.It was further reported that the fragments were detached and hanging from the end of the catheter.The procedure was completed using another balloon.There was no patient contact.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: one ultraverse 014 was returned for evaluation.A visual inspection was done and an unknown residue was noted to be present on the distal end of the device.No break or detached portions were seen on the device.The device was sent for ftir & sem/eds testing to determine the material seen on the device.The residue across the balloon was tested, and the material was suggested to be the applied balloon coating delaminating off the device.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported peeling as the balloon coating was noted to be delaminating off the device.The investigation is unconfirmed for the reported break, as no break was seen to the device.The user was likely referring to the peeling balloon coating in the reported event.The definitive root cause was determined to be likely manufacturing related.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.D4 (unique identifier (udi) #), g3, h6 (device, method, result, conclusion).Section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAVERSE 014
Common Device Name
PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
CLEARSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
moyne upper
enniscorthy, co. wexford N A
EI   N A
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key23404925
Report Number2020394-2025-01796
Device Sequence Number20059094
Product Code LIT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741064586
UDI-Public(01)00801741064586(11)240627(17)270531(10)CMJT0036
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K121856
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/19/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberU4150530
Device Lot NumberCMJT0036
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/09/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/23/2025
03/18/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/28/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/30/2025
03/20/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/27/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-