• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 4 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 4 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33630024
Medical Device Problem Codes Osseointegration Problem (3003); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Cyst(s) (1800); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 09/30/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the available information the device will not be returned therefore an evaluation of the device cannot be performed.A review of the device history is not possible because the lot number was not communicated.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery for reasons that are not available at the time of this report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery due to talar loosening due to cysts.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could be confirmed, since the loosening of the talar component due to cysts can be confirmed with the provided ct scan.There are large cysts visible and there is a clear radiolucence visible.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Upon further investigation of the ct scans, healthcare professionals opined that- the loosening of the talar component due to cysts can be confirmed with the provided ct scan.There are large cysts visible and there is a clear radiolucence visible.There is also minor radiolucence visible adjacent to the tibial component and it might be loosened as well, but that is not confirmed by the provided information.The underlying cause of the failure is not clear, but can be related to poor bone substance and therefore a patient related factor.However, failure of total ankle replacement tar over time is a known complication.In case of a planned revision procedure a medical opinion aiming to determine the root cause of the failure is part of the internal investigation process.Sufficient radiological and clinical information must be provided to enable a meaningful clinical assessment and to identify possible causes of failure.In cases where a ct scan is the only available clinical source, this assessment is limited.No conclusive statement can be provided, because key clinical information e.G., clinical status, exact symptoms, and range of motion of the patient, assessment of the treating physician is missing.The root causes of radiographic findings such as radiolucent areas and bone cysts are often complex and multifactorial and cannot be determined scientifically without this decisive evidence.Due to these limitations, we are unable in such cases to provide statements about the patient, the procedure and or the device in relation to cause of the failure.Based on investigation, the issue occurred most probably due to patient related factor i.E.Poor bone substance.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available to determine the root cause of the complaint event.If the device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 4 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
dannielle stap
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key23405648
Report Number3010667733-2025-01257
Device Sequence Number11993853
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00840420122056
UDI-Public(01)00840420122056(11)210819(17)290819(10)1708647
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryAS
PMA/510(K) Number
K123954
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/05/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number33630024
Device Lot Number1708647
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/30/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/10/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/28/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/05/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured08/19/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-