| Model Number |
DRT225 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Flashers (1864); Visual Disturbances (2140); Halo (2227)
|
| Date of Event |
09/05/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information/correction: upon further review, additional information was received at the time of the initial mdr, but was inadvertently not included.Therefore, it is being captured in this supplemental report.Additional information was received reporting that the patient had a loss of 2 or more lines in bscva.The patient was not over or under corrected and the intended target was 0.00.The patient did not have any pre-existing conditions that affected calculation.It was reported that the device did not cause or contribute to the event.Product information for the suspect device was also received.No further information was provided.The product was received for evaluation.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned and inspected, and no issues were observed.During the product evaluation it was confirmed that the physical characteristics of the lens matched a drt model lens.No further evaluation was performed.The complaint issues reported could not be confirmed during product evaluation, and no issues were identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no similar complaints for this po number have been received.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.The following fields were updated accordingly: section d4: catalog number: drt2250190.Section d4: serial number: (b)(6).Section d4: expiration date: jun 14, 2027.Section d4: primary unique device identification (udi) number: (b)(4).Section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: nov 12, 2025.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Section h4: device manufacture date: jun 14, 2024.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for evaluation and the serial number for this device is unknown/not provided; therefore, no further product investigation can be performed.Should any further relevant information become available a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h4: device manufacture date: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Attempts were made to obtain the missing information; however, no additional information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the preloaded multifocal toric intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the right eye due to the patient¿s complaints of increased glare, halos, and starbursts while driving at night.The issue was first identified during a post-operative examination.Another johnson & johnson lens was implanted as replacement; diu225 19.0 diopter.There were no unplanned complications, such as incision enlargement, sutures, or vitrectomy.No medical attention or medication outside standard of care was required and there were no surgical delays.The patient is fully recovered.Daily activities are not affected.Pre-operative best spectacle corrected visual acuity (bscva) was 20/20-2 and post-operative bscva was 20/20+1.It was reported that the directions for use were followed.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|