• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SALTER LABS SALTER LABS; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, PREFORMED NASAL, HIGH VOLUME LOW PRESSURE, CUFFED (PFNC), PAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SALTER LABS SALTER LABS; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, PREFORMED NASAL, HIGH VOLUME LOW PRESSURE, CUFFED (PFNC), PAR Back to Search Results
Model Number I-PFNC-65 (SALTER H-PFNC-65)
Medical Device Problem Code Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545)
Date of Event 08/07/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during intubation, there was resistance.Upon examination with a video laryngoscope, bleeding was observed.It appeared difficult to pass the endoscope through the posterior pharyngeal wall, which resulted in mucosal damage the tube was removed, and oral intubation was performed.This incident caused a delay in intubation, patient therapy, and harm to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product involved in the report has not been returned for evaluation.A review of the device history record is not possible as no lot number was provided.The documented udi is based on the stock/product code provided by the reporter; the udi-pi is not available as no lot number was provided.All information reasonably known as of 29 oct 2025 has been included in this health authority report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by airlife.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to airlife.Airlife.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the airlife complaint database and identified as complaint- (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that a airlife.Product is defective or caused or contributed to a serious injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product involved in the report has not been returned for evaluation.A review of the device history record is not possible as no lot number was provided.The documented udi is based on the stock/product code provided by the reporter; the udi-pi is not available as no lot number was provided.All information reasonably known as of 29 oct 2025 has been included in this health authority report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by airlife.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to airlife.Airlife.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the airlife complaint database and identified as (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that a airlife.Product is defective or caused or contributed to a serious injury.Complaint was considered not confirmed based on lack of sample availability.A 24 month review was conducted and 0 additional complaints identified as related to this issue.The lot number was not provided, however the vendor was notified of the incident.This incident was not identified as an increasing trend.No further action to be taken.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during intubation, there was resistance.Upon examination with a video laryngoscope, bleeding was observed.It appeared difficult to pass the endoscope through the posterior pharyngeal wall, which resulted in mucosal damage the tube was removed, and oral intubation was performed.This incident caused a delay in intubation, patient therapy, and harm to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SALTER LABS
Common Device Name
ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, PREFORMED NASAL, HIGH VOLUME LOW PRESSURE, CUFFED (PFNC), PAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
SALTER LABS
30 spur drive
el paso TX 79906
Manufacturer (Section G)
SALTER LABS DE MEXICO DE S.A. DE C.V.
blvd. independencia #2167 parq
ind. las ameri - hor sur cd ju
chihuahua mexico, mexico 32596
MX   32596
Manufacturer Contact
melissa brickley
2710 northridge dr nw suite a
grand rapids, MI 49544
MDR Report Key23419260
Report Number3004748541-2025-00098
Device Sequence Number13370058
Product Code BTR
UDI-Device Identifier00607411954429
UDI-Public(01)00607411954429
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K100546
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/29/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberI-PFNC-65 (SALTER H-PFNC-65)
Device Catalogue NumberI-PFNC-65 (SALTER H-PFNC-65)
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/29/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/29/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/29/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/29/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-