|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: the actual device was returned for evaluation.However, since the investigation is still on-going, the assignable root cause could not be determined at this time.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: the product was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.Visual inspection of the returned device found it was returned in used condition with the broken upper jaw and deformed lower jaw.Not all the broken pieces were returned for evaluation, as well as the needle and suture.No other anomalies were noted.A functional test was performed by activation of the device.Using a sample rotator cuff simulator, test suture and test needle, the device trigger was pressed, and the needle deployed and functioned as expected.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the expressew iii ac+ gun would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to an improper handling of the device or procedural variables, such as excessive force applied during usage which could overload the device material and/or lead breakage.As per the instructions for use, 1) inspect the suture passer prior to use to ensure proper mechanical function.Visually inspect the instrument and check for damage and wear, where jaws and teeth are aligned properly, the locking mechanisms fasten securely and close easily, and long, thin instruments are free of bending and distortion.2) do not use on bone or similar hard tissue.Properly handling and¿attention to the approved use of the device diminishes the risk of failure.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.¿.
|