| Model Number |
101-9810 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/01/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A retroactive review of events within the quality system identified this record as requiring remediation, including reporting and submission of an initial emdr per applicable criteria.Boston scientific has opened a corrective and preventive action (capa 8647) investigation to determine the root cause for why an initial emdr was not previously submitted to the fda in accordance with boston scientific established mdr reporting process and fda adverse event reporting requirements.Information gained through these investigation efforts will be utilized to determine root cause and implement appropriate preventive action(s), as necessary.The device was returned for analysis, and the complaint was confirmed.Visual inspection showed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off the implant body.The damage was sufficient enough to preclude functional testing.The damage indicates failure was likely due to deployment against resistance (e.G., bone) and/or manipulation of the position of the device by gear shifting of the inserter.Based on the product analysis, the most probable cause of the complaint is unintended use error caused or contributed to event.Additionally, a labeling review was completed and revealed no anomalies.The instructions for use state that deployment should not be forced or implant breakage or damage to bony structures may result.Furthermore, if resistance to deployment is encountered, and repositioning of the implant is required, the driver should be rotated counterclockwise until a positive stop is reached and withdraw dorsally to collapse the cam lobes.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a superion implant procedure, the spacer would not open, and the procedure had to be aborted.The patients anatomy was challenging as there was limited space in the spinous process.The physician did not use excessive force during the procedure.The broken spacer was removed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A retroactive review of events within the quality system identified this record as requiring remediation, including reporting and submission of an initial emdr per applicable criteria.Boston scientific has opened a corrective and preventive action (capa 8647) investigation to determine the root cause for why an initial emdr was not previously submitted to the fda in accordance with boston scientific established mdr reporting process and fda adverse event reporting requirements.Information gained through these investigation efforts will be utilized to determine root cause and implement appropriate preventive action(s), as necessary.The device was returned for analysis, and the complaint was confirmed.Visual inspection showed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off the implant body and was deformed.The damage was sufficient enough to preclude functional testing.The damage indicates failure was likely due to deployment against resistance (e.G., bone) and/or manipulation of the position of the device by gear shifting of the inserter.Based on the product analysis, the most probable cause of the complaint is unintended use error caused or contributed to event.Additionally, a labeling review was completed and revealed no anomalies.The instructions for use state that deployment should not be forced or implant breakage or damage to bony structures may result.Furthermore, if resistance to deployment is encountered, and repositioning of the implant is required, the driver should be rotated counterclockwise until a positive stop is reached and withdraw dorsally to collapse the cam lobes.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a superion implant procedure, the spacer would not open, and the procedure had to be aborted.The patients anatomy was challenging as there was limited space in the spinous process.The physician did not use excessive force during the procedure.The broken spacer was removed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|