• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARTHROCARE CORPORATION SUPER TURBOVAC 90 ICW; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARTHROCARE CORPORATION SUPER TURBOVAC 90 ICW; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ASC4250-01
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Date of Event 10/01/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that after a shoulder arthroscopy that had been performed on (b)(6) 2025 with a super turbovac wand, upon the removal of the surgical drapes, a second-degree burn was observed in the left infraclavicular region.The clinic indicates that as of (b)(6) 2025, the patient was in the process of healing from the burn, undergoing follow up by the orthopedist.The patient was left with a small first-degree burn on his left pectoral region, which is being treated by the institution.The size of the burn was 3x 5 cm and was treated with medical dressing.The not affected tissue had no specific protection carried out.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication reported that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product without evidence about a specific product problem.The reported complication relates to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: internal complaint reference case- (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states that the provided photo of the burn confirmed the reported event.It was noted that the injury was in the process of healing.Based on the information provided the clinical root cause for the reported burn could not be determined.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include user technique/ procedural variance, wand tip contact with the non-targeted tissue, contact with other metal surgical instruments or inadequate flow and circulation of saline.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPER TURBOVAC 90 ICW
Common Device Name
ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARTHROCARE CORPORATION
7000 west william cannon drive
austin TX 78735
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARTHROCARE CORPORATION
7000 west william cannon drive
austin TX 78735
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
1450 brooks rd.
memphis, TN 38116
5123913905
MDR Report Key23442264
Report Number3006524618-2025-00629
Device Sequence Number8672822
Product Code GEI
UDI-Device Identifier00817470006421
UDI-Public00817470006421
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCO
PMA/510(K) Number
K033584
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/11/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberASC4250-01
Device Lot Number2182738
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/06/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/10/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/31/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/11/2025
Date Device Manufactured05/12/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age37 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-