• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR CX 35 DETACHABLE; PERIPHERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR CX 35 DETACHABLE; PERIPHERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 45-750824
Medical Device Problem Codes Stretched (1601); Unraveled Material (1664)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/09/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the device unraveled.No injury to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was stated to be available for return to the manufacturer for evaluation but has not yet been returned despite attempts made.The alleged product issue/event as described could not be confirmed.If the device is received at a later date, an investigation will be performed and a supplemental mdr will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that "account stated product unraveled".Additional information: according to the physician, removed it immediately by pulling it back out of the catheter.No patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Based on additional clarifying information received there was no unraveling of the coil.The coil was stretched and no patient injury.Therefore, mvi no longer considers this event a reportable malfunction.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation of the returned coil system found the implant to be stretched at the proximal section and separated from the pusher with the monofilament exposed, which is consistent with the alleged product issue.The exposed monofilament showed a tensile break shape at the tip, which is consistent with the device experiencing force that exceeded the strength of the monofilament causing the implant to separate from the pusher.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the stretched implant, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing forces exceeding the implant's yield strength.The catheter used in the procedure was not returned, so the investigation could not determine if it had caused or contributed to the reported complaint.
 
Event or Problem Description
See h10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AZUR CX 35 DETACHABLE
Common Device Name
PERIPHERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key23447271
Report Number2032493-2025-90623
Device Sequence Number8907731
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00812636021065
UDI-Public(01)00812636021065(11)241028(17)290930(10)0000751703
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K151358
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/02/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number45-750824
Device Lot Number0000751703
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/02/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/18/2025
12/05/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/03/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/29/2025
01/02/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured10/28/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-