|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional manufacturer narrative: d4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.
|
|
It was reported that this was a plif (l5) performed on (b)(6) 2022.This was a second surgery to remove and replace the l3-5 screws that had been inserted during the primary surgery (xlif).The date of the primary surgery and product information were unknown.The surgery was completed successfully without any surgical delay.After surgery, it was confirmed that the l5 screw (verse cannulated cfx screw) was broken.Therefore, a revision surgery will be performed on (b)(6) 2025, and the screw will be replaced with screw from another company.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H11 additional narrative: h3, h6: the product was not returned to depuy synthes, however photos were provided for review.The x-ray investigation revealed that the screw tip was broken.The reported allegation can be confirmed.While no root cause can be established with the available information, factors such as the patient's age, underlying disease, bone density, or a possible early weight-bearing, could have led to implant failure.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the 5.5 ti cort fix 8x50mm would have contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot- the device lot number is unknown, therefore a device history review could not be performed.If the lot/serial number becomes available, the record will be re-assessed.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|