|
SALTER LABS PARKER; PARKER ENDO-BRONCH WITH STANDARD TIP (LEFT DOUBLE-LUMEN ENDOBRONCHIAL TUBE), PST
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
I-PSTDL-37 (SALTER H-PSTDL-37) |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Gas/Air Leak (2946)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/08/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during intubation, there was resistance.Upon examination with a video laryngoscope, bleeding was observed.It appeared difficult to pass the endoscope through the posterior pharyngeal wall, which resulted in mucosal damage the tube was removed, and oral intubation was performed.This incident caused a delay in intubation, patient therapy, and harm to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product involved in the report has not been returned for evaluation.A review of the device history record is not possible as no lot number was provided.The documented udi is based on the stock/product code provided by the reporter; the udi-pi is not available as no lot number was provided.All information reasonably known as of 05 nov 2025 has been included in this health authority report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by airlife.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to airlife.Airlife.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the airlife complaint database and identified as (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that an airlife.Product is defective or caused or contributed to a serious injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during intubation, there was resistance.Upon examination with a video laryngoscope, bleeding was observed.It appeared difficult to pass the endoscope through the posterior pharyngeal wall, which resulted in mucosal damage the tube was removed, and oral intubation was performed.This incident caused a delay in intubation, patient therapy, and harm to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product involved in the report has not been returned for evaluation.A review of the device history record is not possible as no lot number was provided.The documented udi is based on the stock/product code provided by the reporter; the udi-pi is not available as no lot number was provided.All information reasonably known as of 05 nov 2025 has been included in this health authority report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by airlife.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to airlife airlife.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the airlife complaint database and identified as complaint- (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that a airlife.Product is defective or caused or contributed to a serious injury.Device history record (dhr) review: no issues found in the dhr based on the device history record (dhr) review there were no abnormal processing issues noted.All products/packaging were produced per the approved manufacturing procedures, specifications, and inspections.Risk assessment: the ultimate risk is low, as that is the highest risk of the patient/caregiver and regulatory/compliance considerations: 1.Patient/ caregiver performed risk assessment with (b)(4) rev 3.The complaint most closely aligns with risk id r25 with a potential cause of hazard being "cuff having pin hole".Severity = 6, likelihood of occurrence = 2, calculated occurrence = (b)(4).Per ref-20001-c1 rev 2, these levels indicate low risk.2.Regulatory/ compliance reviewed ref-20001-c1 rev 2, and there is low regulatory/ compliance risk.3.Brand recognition and customer impact reviewed ref-20001-c1 rev 2, and there is low brand recognition/customer impact.Complaint history review: the complaint history was reviewed in grand avenue from reported dates 10/06/23 through 10/06/25, for part number i-pstdl-37 and failure mode "a050402 - gas/air leak".There were 9 other complaints reported for the same issue and part number under complaint-(b)(4), during the same timeframe.Sales = (b)(4) ea.Calculated occurrence (p1) = (10 / 31451) x 100 = (b)(4).Occurrence ranking = (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|