| Catalog Number |
10-210 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Capsular Contracture (1761)
|
| Date of Event |
10/13/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Continued e1 -- (b)(6).A review of the device history record has been initiated.If any new, changed or corrected information is noted, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted.The event of capsular contracture is a physiological complication and analysis of the device generally does not assist allergan in determining a probable cause for this event.Further information from the reporter regarding event, product, or patient details has been/will be requested.No additional information is available at this time.Reason for reoperation: capsular contracture, baker grade iii; rupture.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "capsular contracture baker grade iii".Later healthcare professional reported "rupture".This record is for the left side.Device was explanted and replaced.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "capsular contracture baker grade iii".Later healthcare professional reported "rupture".This record is for the left side.Device was explanted and replaced.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation: per the investigation procedure, the device is analyzed through visual inspection microscopic inspection if openings are observed and a weight verification.Per the analysis performed, the assessments of the complaints and any potential manufacturing issue are displayed along with any further actions required: ¿ rupture: observed an opening through microscopic inspection assessed as fold flaw opening.No further actions are required as it is not related to the manufacturing process.¿ capsular contracture: unable to observe through visual inspection as it is a physiological phenomenon.None of the other observations performed during the device analysis (creases, stress marks and wear abrasion) are found to be potentially related to the manufacturing process, and, therefore, no further actions are required for these observations.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|