|
|
| Catalog Number |
7205307 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/10/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H11: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication related to a product problem with a smith+nephew device.The reported issue(s) relate to known risks with the device itself or with its use that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during a shoulder arthroscopy, the full radius blade was releasing unusually large silver particles produced by friction.According to the picture provided, it happened inside the patient.The procedure was resumed, without any delay, using an equivalent sn back-up.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: h3, h6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation.However, a clinical review states that intraoperative photos were provided for review, however they do not indicate a root cause for the reported event.Based on the information provided we are currently unable to rule out a procedural variance as a contributing factor to the reported event.The device ifu does note that ¿excessive ¿side-loading¿ on the blade during use does not improve cutting performance and in extreme cases may result in wear and degradation of the inner assembly.¿ / ¿periodic irrigation of the blade is recommended to provide adequate cooling of the blade and to prevent accumulation of excised materials in the surgical site.¿ device malfunction as a contributing factor to the reported event.The device is intended as an externally communicating device, not approved for implantation; therefore, long-term implantation data is not available.If any shavings were retained within the patient micro-motion or movement cannot be predicted.There would also be potential risk for tissue inflammation and/or pain.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found one similar reported event.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.The root cause could not be determined since findings cannot lead to a clear cause of the reported event.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include insufficient irrigation during use or excessive side-loading.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|