• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 30; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 30; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FV415T
Medical Device Problem Codes Infusion or Flow Problem (2964); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Visual inspection: during the investigation, scratches on the outer housing of the valve were determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the valve is permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of over- drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested in the horizontal position.The results show that the valve operates within the accepted tolerances in the horizontal position.Adjustment test: the progav was tested and is not adjustable.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is operational, however the braking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valve, deposits were found in progav.Result: based on our investigation results, we can determine a non-adjustability in the valve.The determined deposits can be named as the cause for the non-adjustability.Proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid can influence the function temporarily and are known side effects in hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav shuntsystem (#fv415t) was implanted during a procedure performed on an unspecified date.According to the complainant, the shunt system caused an overdrainage and had adjustment difficulties.The patient underwent a revision procedure on an unspecified date.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.The complained device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 30
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key23501434
Report Number3004721439-2025-00329
Device Sequence Number13038200
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906132125
UDI-Public(01)04041906132125(11)240704(17)290702(10)20076295
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K103003
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 11/07/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberFV415T
Device Catalogue NumberFV415T
Device Lot Number20076295
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/21/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/21/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/07/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/04/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age18 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight51 KG
-
-