| Model Number |
001350 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Connection Problem (2900)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Low Oxygen Saturation (2477)
|
| Date of Event |
09/27/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product involved in the report has not been returned.A review of the device history record is in-progress.All information reasonably known as of 07 nov 2025 has been included in the health authority report.Should additional information be obtained a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by airlife.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to airlife.Airlife has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the airlife complaint database and is identified as complaint (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that a airlife product is defective or causes serious injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a medical device incident (mdi) with harm or with the potential for serious harm/death has been reported.- cardinal health canada product complaint (b)(4).Unknown patient arrived via ems in critical condition following a severe burn injury.Intermittent spo2 challenges including during intubation with manual ventilation via mask, and manual ventilation via ett.Spo2 54% at the lowest.Patient requiring continuous high flow o2 therapy (15lpm via non-rebreather, followed by continuous manual ventilation via mask then ett for 45 minutes, then eventually 100% on ventilator, due to patient's injuries.During this time on 3 occasions, rrts noticed bagger was disconnected from o2 tubing on the bagger side.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a medical device incident (mdi) with harm or with the potential for serious harm/death has been reported.- cardinal health canada product complaint pcs251008ioeliy.Unknown patient arrived via ems in critical condition following a severe burn injury.Intermittent spo2 challenges including during intubation with manual ventilation via mask, and manual ventilation via ett.Spo2 54% at the lowest.Patient requiring continuous high flow o2 therapy (15lpm via non-rebreather, followed by continuous manual ventilation via mask then ett for 45 minutes, then eventually 100% on ventilator, due to patient's injuries.During this time on 3 occasions, rrts noticed bagger was disconnected from o2 tubing on the bagger side.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product involved in the report has not been returned.A review of the device history record is in-progress.All information reasonably known as of 07 nov 2025 has been included in the health authority report.Should additional information be obtained a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by airlife.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to airlife.Airlife has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the airlife complaint database and is identified as (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that a airlife product is defective or causes serious injury.The complaint of "3 occasions, rrts noticed bagger was disconnected from o2 tubing on the bagger side." regarding part 001350 was not confirmed.The root cause was determined to likely be user error.A risk assessment was performed, and the ultimate risk was determined to be medium which does not require escalation to the capa review board.There have been 14 other complaints regarding the same part and a similar issues within the 24 months preceding this reported event.A resolution letter was sent to the customer.Complaints will continue to be monitored for possible trends.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|