|
Batch review performed on 29-10-2025.Pedicle screw 03.68.391 must polyaxial cann screw d 7x40 - d 5.5/6 (k234048) lot 2458063: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 03-apr-2024 expiration date: 2029-03-07.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been sold with no similar reported event during the period of review.Pedicle screw 03.68.392 must polyaxial cann screw d 7x45 - d 5.5/6 (k234048) lot 2458064: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 02-apr-2024 expiration date: 2029-03-06.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been sold with no similar reported event during the period of review.Pedicle screw 03.68.393 must polyaxial cann screw d 7x50 - d 5.5/6 (k234048) lot 2329189: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 07-mar-2024 expiration date: 2029-02-13.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been sold with no similar reported event during the period of review.Pedicle screw 03.68.393 must polyaxial cann screw d 7x50 - d 5.5/6 (k234048) lot 2464193: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 19-nov-2024 expiration date: 2029-11-04.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been sold with no similar reported event during the period of review.It should be noted that 6 screws are listed in this complaint from 4 different lots, it is unknown which screw presents the unscrewing clinical evaluation performed by clinical affairs department: after a spine fusion surgery from l3 to l5, the patient came for a routine follow-up x-ray, which revealed a dislocation of a set screw from the corresponding tulip screw.The patient did not report any symptoms.The available imaging confirms the dislocation of the set screw from one of the two most proximal tulip screws.Determining the cause of this failure is challenging based on the available information.The most likely hypothesis could be an issue during the locking maneuver, although this remains uncertain.However, considering that the set screw is now freely located within the soft tissues, we cannot exclude the possibility of secondary migration.Moreover, the overall construct has a reduced mechanical strength, as one of the rod has lost its proximal anchorage.For these reasons, potential secondary complications cannot be excluded.Root cause:based on the information available it is not possible to establish a definitive root cause, while the device history record review does not indicate any potentially related manufacturing issue.
|
|
Torque limiter handles verification: three torque limiter handles were received (used for set screws fixation) and subjected to torque verification testing.The results of the analysis did not reveal any evidence of insufficient torque application.Based on these findings, the reported set screw loosening cannot be attributed to inadequate torque delivery by the torque limiter handles.Root cause: no action can be planned at this time as no root cause could be identified with the information available, while the event has been included in our active monitoring system for potential capa needs and opportunities.
|