|
ABBOTT IRELAND DIAGNOSTICS DIVISION ALINITY I STAT HIGH SENSITIVITY TROPONIN-I; IMMUNOASSAY METHOD, TROPONIN SUBUNIT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
04Z21-25 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
High Test Results (2457)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/22/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer reported falsely elevated alinity i stat high sensitive troponin-i generated from alinity i processing module and provided the following data: a 54 year old male patient with a history of hypertension presented to the emergency department with chest pain that as occurring for approximately 2 days.Initial cardiac enzymes were negative and the patient was initiated on antiplatelet therapy, beta-blocker, nitrates and heparin.The patient had one elevated troponin result (244.36 ng/l) and was taken to the cardiac cath lab due to the elevated result in combination with the chest pain symptoms.Cath lab revealed multivessel coronary artery disease including significant ostial left main disease.The patient was transferred to icu and was to be evaluated for cardiovascular surgery.It was reported that no patient harm occurred.The customer provided the following laboratory data: initial troponins were negative (<2.7 ng/l).Customer reported sample id (b)(6) had a troponin result of 244.36 ng/l.The customer repeated this sample 4 times and generated a results of <2.7 ng/l.The customer reported additional patient discrepant troponins: for a 66 year old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id (b)(6) initial result was 42.6 ng/l and repeat result was 2.76 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn (b)(6).When tested on sn (b)(6), the results were 3.3 ng/l & 2.9 ng/dl (customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l) for a 63 year old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id (b)(6) initial result was 39.49 ng/l and repeat result was 13.64 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn (b)(6).When tested on sn (b)(6), the result was 15.7 ng/dl (customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l) for a 41 year old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id (b)(6) initial result was 15.1 ng/l and repeat result was 14.7 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn (b)(6).When tested on sn (b)(6), the results were <2.7 & <2.7 ng/dl (customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l) no patient data was provided for this example: customer reported initial result was <2.7 and then she ran it on the other analyzer sn (b)(6) and it gave a result of 96.8.Sample was then repeated the run on both instruments and received a result of <2.7 on both instruments.There was no further impact to patient management reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An evaluation is in process.A follow-up report will be submitted when the evaluation is complete.A1 patient identifier: sample id's are (b)(6).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer reported falsely elevated alinity i stat high sensitive troponin-i generated from alinity i processing module and provided the following data: a 54-year-old male patient with a history of hypertension presented to the emergency department with chest pain that as occurring for approximately 2 days.Initial cardiac enzymes were negative and the patient was initiated on antiplatelet therapy, beta-blocker, nitrates and heparin.The patient had one elevated troponin result (244.36 ng/l) and was taken to the cardiac cath lab due to the elevated result in combination with the chest pain symptoms.Cath lab revealed multivessel coronary artery disease including significant ostial left main disease.The patient was transferred to icu and was to be evaluated for cardiovascular surgery.It was reported that no patient harm occurred.The customer provided the following laboratory data: initial troponins were negative (<2.7 ng/l).Customer reported sample id (b)(6) had a troponin result of 244.36 ng/l.The customer repeated this sample 4 times and generated a results of <2.7 ng/l.The customer reported additional patient discrepant troponins: for a 66-year-old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id (b)(6) initial result was 42.6 ng/l and repeat result was 2.76 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn (b)(6).When tested on sn (b)(6), the results were 3.3 ng/l & 2.9 ng/dl (customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l) for a 63-year-old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id (b)(6) initial result was 39.49 ng/l and repeat result was 13.64 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn (b)(6).When tested on sn (b)(6), the result was 15.7 ng/dl (customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l).For a 41-year-old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id (b)(6) initial result was 15.1 ng/l and repeat result was 14.7 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn (b)(6).When tested on sn (b)(6), the results were <2.7 & <2.7 ng/dl (customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l).No patient data was provided for this example: customer reported initial result was <2.7 and then she ran it on the other analyzer sn (b)(6) and it gave a result of 96.8.Sample was then repeated the run on both instruments and received a result of <2.7 on both instruments.There was no further impact to patient management reported.Update: the customer provided additional patient examples: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id (b)(6) result was 82.82 ng/l and repeat was 2.87 ng/l.When repeated on another instrument, the results were 4.06 ng/l & 4.37ng/l.Sample id (b)(6) result was184.07 ng/l and repeat result was <2.7ng/l.When repeated on another instrument, the results were <2.7ng/l & <2.7ng/l.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information can be found in section b5.A1 patient identifier: sample id's update to (b)(6).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A complaint investigation was conducted for the alinity i stat high sensitivity troponin-i reagent lot: 78015ud00.Review of tracking and trending by list number and by complaint lot did not identify any trends.Accuracy testing was completed using panels which mimic patient samples using an in-house retained kit of lot: 78015ud00.All specifications were met indicating that the lot is performing acceptably.Device history review did not identify issues associated with the customer¿s observation.Labeling review concludes that the issue is adequately addressed.Based on our investigation, no systemic issue or deficiency was identified with the alinity i stat high sensitivity troponin-i reagent, lot number: 78015ud00.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer reported falsely elevated alinity i stat high sensitive troponin-i generated from alinity i processing module and provided the following data: a 54 year old male patient with a history of hypertension presented to the emergency department with chest pain that as occurring for approximately 2 days.Initial cardiac enzymes were negative and the patient was initiated on antiplatelet therapy, beta-blocker, nitrates and heparin.The patient had one elevated troponin result (244.36 ng/l) and was taken to the cardiac cath lab due to the elevated result in combination with the chest pain symptoms.Cath lab revealed multivessel coronary artery disease including significant ostial left main disease.The patient was transferred to icu and was to be evaluated for cardiovascular surgery.It was reported that no patient harm occurred.The customer provided the following laboratory data: initial troponins were negative (<2.7 ng/l).Customer reported sample id: (b)(6) had a troponin result of 244.36 ng/l.The customer repeated this sample 4 times and generated a results of <2.7 ng/l.The customer reported additional patient discrepant troponins: for a 66-year-old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id: (b)(6) initial result was 42.6 ng/l and repeat result was 2.76 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn: (b)(6).When tested on sn: (b)(6), the results were 3.3 ng/l & 2.9 ng/dl (customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l).For a 63-year-old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id: (b)(6) initial result was 39.49 ng/l and repeat result was 13.64 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn: (b)(6).When tested on sn: (b)(6), the result was 15.7 ng/dl (customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l).For a 41-year-old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id: (b)(6) initial result was 15.1 ng/l and repeat result was 14.7 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn: (b)(6).When tested on sn: (b)(6), the results were <2.7 & <2.7 ng/dl (customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l).No patient data was provided for this example: customer reported initial result was <2.7 and then she ran it on the other analyzer sn: (b)(6) and it gave a result of 96.8.Sample was then repeated the run on both instruments and received a result of <2.7 on both instruments.There was no further impact to patient management reported.Update: the customer provided additional patient examples: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id: (b)(6) result was 82.82 ng/l and repeat was 2.87 ng/l.When repeated on another instrument, the results were 4.06 ng/l & 4.37ng/l.Sample id: (b)(6) result was 184.07 ng/l and repeat result was <2.7ng/l.When repeated on another instrument, the results were <2.7ng/l & <2.7ng/l.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer reported falsely elevated alinity i stat high sensitive troponin-i generated from alinity i processing module and provided the following data: a 54 year old male patient with a history of hypertension presented to the emergency department with chest pain that as occurring for approximately 2 days.Initial cardiac enzymes were negative and the patient was initiated on antiplatelet therapy, beta-blocker, nitrates and heparin.The patient had one elevated troponin result (244.36 ng/l) and was taken to the cardiac cath lab due to the elevated result in combination with the chest pain symptoms.Cath lab revealed multivessel coronary artery disease including significant ostial left main disease.The patient was transferred to icu and was to be evaluated for cardiovascular surgery.It was reported that no patient harm occurred.The customer provided the following laboratory data: initial troponins were negative (<2.7 ng/l).Customer reported sample id (b)(6) had a troponin result of 244.36 ng/l.The customer repeated this sample 4 times and generated a results of <2.7 ng/l.The customer reported additional patient discrepant troponins: for a 66-year-old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id (b)(6) initial result was 42.6 ng/l and repeat result was 2.76 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn (b)(6).When tested on sn (b)(6), the results were 3.3 ng/l & 2.9 ng/l (customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l) for a 63-year-old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id (b)(6) initial result was 39.49 ng/l and repeat result was 13.64 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn (b)(6).When tested on sn (b)(6), the result was 15.7 ng/l.(customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l) for a 41-year-old female patient the customer provided the provided the following data: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id (b)(6) initial result was 15.1 ng/l and repeat result was 14.7 ng/l, generated from alinity i processing module sn (b)(6).When tested on sn (b)(6), the results were <2.7 & <2.7 ng/l.(customer normal ranges: female 0-14 ng/l) no patient data was provided for this example: customer reported initial result was <2.7 and then she ran it on the other analyzer sn (b)(6) and it gave a result of 96.8.Sample was then repeated the run on both instruments and received a result of <2.7 on both instruments.There was no further impact to patient management reported.Update: the customer provided additional patient examples: on (b)(6) 2025, sample id (b)(6) result was 82.82 ng/l and repeat was 2.87 ng/l.When repeated on another instrument, the results were 4.06 ng/l & 4.37ng/l sample id (b)(6) result was184.07 ng/l and repeat result was <2.7ng/l.When repeated on another instrument, the results were <2.7ng/l & <2.7ng/l.Update: the test results generated were reported in ng/l.Documentation of ng/dl was a typographical error.The unit of measure was corrected to ng/l.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This supplemental mdr is being submitted to correct the units of measure in section b5 and provide additional investigation information in section h11.A full review of the alinity i processing module sn: (b)(6) was completed by field service, and no issues were identified with the instrument at that time.However, during subsequent troubleshooting, the sample probe and pressure monitor sensor were replaced and calibrated.Additionally, the trigger pump was replaced, and the trigger/pre-trigger tubing fittings were tightened.Despite these service actions, no apparent issues were found with any of the replaced or adjusted components, and the instrument could not be definitively identified as the cause of the issue.Additionally, potential sample integrity or sample handling concerns were also identified and could not be ruled out as contributing factors.Based on the investigation, no systemic issue was identified.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|