• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON CLAREON PANOPTIX TRIFOCAL UV ABSORBING INTRAOCULAR LENS; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON CLAREON PANOPTIX TRIFOCAL UV ABSORBING INTRAOCULAR LENS; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number CCWTT0
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Blurred Vision (2137)
Date of Event 07/15/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
A non-healthcare professional reported that following the intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, the patient vision was not good at all distance.This made the patient life and work difficult.The physician was planned to explant lens.Additional information has been received that in-surgeon opinion lens caused or contributed the event.Patient had small palpebral fissure with higher tear meniscus, which was less tolerable by the company lens.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for analysis; the lens remains implanted.Complaint history and product history records were reviewed and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.Root cause has not been identified.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information provided in b.2., b.5., d6b.And h.6.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information has been received that the lens was explanted and exchanged.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information provided in h.6.And h.11.The product was not returned.A device history record review and a non-conformance review of the reported lot number was conducted.The deviation review did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.The product investigation could not identify a root cause for the reported complaint.The product has not been received to evaluate.Each lens is subjected to a 100% assessment of the power and optical resolution during the manufacturing process in order to determine acceptability per the lens model and diopter.Information was provided that the company 18.5 diopter (add power +2.2/+3.2) lens was replaced with a non-company, 18.5 diopter, monofocal lens model.Due to the exchange of a multifocal lens to a monofocal lens, this may suggest that the replacement lens model was an improved choice for the patient's vision needs.No additional information has been provided at this time.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information provided in d.9., h.3., h.6.And h.11.The lens was returned inside a specimen cup.Solution was dried on the lens.The optic was cut across the center, typical of insertion and removal.Power and resolution testing could not be conducted due to the extensive optic damage.A device history record review and a non-conformance review of the reported lot number was conducted.The deviation review did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.The file indicated the use of associated products.However, they are not relevant to the reported complaint.The product investigation could not identify a root cause for the reported complaint.Each lens was subjected to a 100% assessment of the power and optical resolution during the manufacturing process in order to determine acceptability per the lens model and diopter.The power and resolution of the returned lens could not be re-evaluated due to the extensive optic damage.Information was provided that the company 18.5 diopter (add power +2.2/+3.2) lens was replaced with a non-company, 18.5 diopter, monofocal lens model.Due to the exchange of a multifocal lens to a monofocal lens, this may suggest that the replacement lens model was an improved choice for the patient's vision needs.No additional information has been provided at this time.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CLAREON PANOPTIX TRIFOCAL UV ABSORBING INTRAOCULAR LENS
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON
246 kyle lane
huntington WV 25702
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON
246 kyle lane
huntington WV 25702
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schlech
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8007579780
MDR Report Key23512362
Report Number1119421-2025-02897
Device Sequence Number13178318
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier00380652413619
UDI-Public(01)00380652413619(17)280611(11)240613(10)15870861
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOK
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P190018
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Device Explanted Year2025
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/29/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberCCWTT0
Device Catalogue NumberCCWTT0.185
Device Lot Number15870861
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/16/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/03/2025
01/14/2026
04/07/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/10/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/26/2025
02/08/2026
04/29/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/13/2024
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
MONARCH CARTRIDGE.; ORA.; PROVISC.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other; Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-