• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NEURAVI LTD. EMBOGUARD; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, NEUROVASCULATURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NEURAVI LTD. EMBOGUARD; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, NEUROVASCULATURE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number BG8785U
Medical Device Problem Code Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/04/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The company is seeking this information through the event investigation.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event or Problem Description
A healthcare professional reported the procedure was a mechanical thrombectomy of the middle cerebral artery for treatment of an acute ischemic stroke, the lesion was tandem.The emboguard 87, 85 cm balloon catheter (bg8785u, 9840112) preparation was completed and inserted into the sheath.Because this was a tandem case, the emboguard was retained in the common carotid artery (cca) to continue the procedure.The emboguard kinked during withdrawal of the inner device, so it was replaced with an optimo.The procedure was successfully completed.There was no negative impact to the patient.A continuous flush was done.The devices were used according to the instructions for use (ifu).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer ref# (b)(4) updated sections on this medwatch: b4, b5, g3, g6, h2, h6 and h11.Section b5: additional event information received on 12-nov-2025 indicating that there was no allegation of patient injury due to an alleged product issue.Complaint conclusion: a healthcare professional reported that the procedure was a mechanical thrombectomy of the middle cerebral artery for treatment of an acute ischemic stroke, the lesion was tandem.The emboguard 87, 85 cm balloon catheter (bg8785u, 9840112) preparation was completed and inserted into the sheath.Because this was a tandem case, the emboguard was retained in the common carotid artery (cca) to continue the procedure.The emboguard kinked during withdrawal of the inner device, so it was replaced with an optimo.The procedure was success sfully completed.There was no negative impact to the patient.A continuous flush was done.The devices were used according to the instructions for use (ifu).Additional event information received on 12-nov-2025 indicating that there was no allegation of patient injury due to an alleged product issue.Since no device has been received for analysis, no product investigation can be performed and the reported failure could not be evaluated.A device history review (dhr) associated with this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection process that can be related to the reported complaint.With the information available and without the product available for analysis, the reported customer complaint could not be confirmed.Based on the device history review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.The exact cause of the event could not be determined; however, there are circumstances of the procedure that may have contributed to the reported failure.The instructions for use (ifu) of the emboguard devices cautions users against advancing or withdrawing the catheter or dilator against resistance without careful assessment of the cause of resistance using fluoroscopy.If cause cannot be determined, withdraw the catheter/dilator while exercising caution.Movement against resistance may result in damage to vessel or catheter/dilator, e.G.Kinking, or cause patient injury.Additionally, if the emboguard catheter becomes severely kinked, users are instructed to withdraw the entire system, (i.E.Emboguard catheter, intermediate catheter, guidewire, etc.).Use of a damaged device may result in vessel injury.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer ref# (b)(4) updated sections on this medwatch: b4, b5, g3, g6, h2, and h11.Section b5: additional event information received on 04-dec-2025 indicated that although it is unclear if excessive force was used with the involved device, the senior physician commented that the possibility that excessive pushing force was applied cannot be ruled out.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EMBOGUARD
Common Device Name
CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, NEUROVASCULATURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
NEURAVI LTD.
block 3
ballybritt business park
galway H91 K 5YD
EI  H91 K5YD
Manufacturer (Section G)
LAKE REGION MEDICAL GALWAY
parkmore business park west
county galway H91 C K22
EI   H91 CK22
Manufacturer Contact
henry boden
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
9497882078
MDR Report Key23512877
Report Number3011370111-2025-00115
Device Sequence Number13167281
Product Code QJP
UDI-Device Identifier10886704082736
UDI-Public(01)10886704082736(11)250429(17)271028(10)9840112
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K212340
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/02/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberBG8785U
Device Lot Number9840112
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/06/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/13/2025
12/04/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/10/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/01/2025
12/04/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/29/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-