| Model Number |
CNWET0 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
10/14/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A product was not returned for analysis.Complaint history and product history records were reviewed and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.Root cause has not been identified.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A healthcare professional reported that during an intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, the iol was pinched in the cutting tunnel incision and tore.The lens was removed during an initial procedure and replaced with another unspecified lens.There was not any issue the visual acuity was 1.0.Cornea was clear iol was located in capsula bag, iol was clear.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information was provided in h.3., h.6.And h.11.Correction information was provided in b.5.And h.6.Correction: on initial mdr the impact code should have been f1905 instead of f24 the product was not returned for analysis.Only photo was returned, and lens damage was observed on the returned photo.A product history record review and a non-conformance review of the reported lot number was conducted.No deviations were identified and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.Provided photos show an iol in a lens case base.The lens is not positioned correctly in the lens case base well, the lens appears to be posterior surface up instead of anterior surface up in the iol case.One haptic appears to be broken, the other haptic is deformed.The lens optic appears to be damaged/chipped.The incision size indicated did not correlate to the recommended size for the cartridge used.Based on our observation of the attached photo, the lens is positioned in the lens case base well, one haptic appears to be broken, the other haptic is deformed.The lens optic appears to be damaged/chipped.The origin of the observed damage cannot be confirmed based on the returned photo.The product was subject to handling and the reported damage was highlighted post implantation.The incision size indicated did not correlate to the recommended size for the cartridge used.It is unclear if this may have contributed to the reported event.A final root cause cannot be determined based on available information.Based on the results from the product history record, the products met release criteria.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Lens was removed during initial procedure and replaced with company lens.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|