• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ESTABLISHMENT LABS S.A. MOTIVA IMPLANTS; SILKSURFACE PLUS WITH QID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ESTABLISHMENT LABS S.A. MOTIVA IMPLANTS; SILKSURFACE PLUS WITH QID Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RSF-275+Q
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 01/15/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
Brazil.Legal case.Allegedly, a patient had a mammography and ultrasound that indicated a suspected intracapsular rupture of her left breast implant, the suspicion was confirmed by an mri performed on (b)(6) 2025.A replacement surgery was required; new implants from another brand were placed.No patient demographics, such as weight, or ethnicity, were provided by the reporter.Efforts to gather additional information are ongoing, and the investigation remains in progress.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
As stated in the literature, ¿a number of risk factors for rupture have been identified; the most common cause is surgical instrument damage.¿ (handel et al., 2013).Additionally, rupture is a common and known reason for complaints, and it is clearly characterized in the product dfu included with the implant, as stated above.Additionally, no cases of rupture because of product failure have been reported to establishment labs ever.Per our directions for use, each patient must receive the establishment labs s.A.¿motiva implants®: information for the patient¿ during her surgical consultation, it is the surgeons´ responsibility to ensure that the patient completely understands the information regarding the risks, benefits, and recommendations associated with silicone gel-filled breast implant surgery, as well as the complications typical of any type of surgery.This document is available in motiva® website: ifu.Motiva.Health.The instructions for use in the directions for use were reviewed to determine if there are indications that ensure the prevention and good handling of the product.For this event, it is considered that the information is suitable for the section of surgical precautions as follows: rupture: ¿breast implants can potentially remain intact for decades in the body, but all such devices will fail at some point.Breast implants rupture when the shell develops a tear or hole.Rupture can occur at any time after implantation, but it is most likely to occur; the longer the implant is in place.The following may cause implants to rupture: damage by surgical instruments, implant stress, and weakening during implantation, age and design of the implant, submuscular rather than sub-glandular location, the occurrence of post-operatory hematomas or seromas, folding or wrinkling of the implant shell, excessive force to the chest, trauma, compression during mammographic imaging, and severe capsular contracture¿.Establishment labs requests the unit to confirm the event and to perform the corresponding testing (including but not limited to: revision and characterization under the microscope of the rupture section, mechanical testing according to approved standards, etc.).Breast implants are not considered lifetime devices, and implant rupture is a risk associated with breast surgery, which can occur at any time.Establishment labs will continue to monitor for similar complaints/trends.As part of the post market surveillance process, monitoring of the primary endpoints reported is performed to determine unfavorable trends.Per our current complaint data report, no unfavorable trends were detected on this product.No further actions are required.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
General conclusion: device involvement: a causal relationship between the reported event and the device has been established.Event characterization: the event was classified as device rupture.Technical investigation summary: laboratory testing.The corresponding laboratory tests could not be performed due to unit involved was not returned for analysis.Clinical confirmation: upon thorough evaluation of the submitted clinical documentation and supporting evidence, the reported case was confirmed.Root cause analysis: based on the investigation performed the root cause of the reported event could not be determined, as the explanted unit was not available for evaluation.Dfu and labeling evaluation: the alleged event is a known, well-documented complication associated with silicone breast implants.It is clearly addressed in the product¿s directions for use (dfu), which states: rupture: breast implants rupture when the shell develops a tear or hole.Rupture can occur at any time after implantation but is more likely to occur the longer the implant is in place.The following may cause implants to rupture: damage by surgical instruments, implant stress and weakening during implantation, implant age and design, submuscular rather than subgranular location, the occurrence of post-operatory hematomas or seromas, folding or wrinkling of the implant shell, excessive force to the chest, trauma, compression during mammographic imaging, and severe capsular contracture.Silicone gel-filled implant ruptures are most often silent; this means that most of the time, neither the doctor nor the patient can determine with the physical examination if the implant has a tear or hole in the shell.The integrity of breast implants (and detection of gel fractures and/or silent ruptures) can be evaluated through several techniques.High-resolution ultrasound (hrus) is widely accepted by healthcare providers and patients for rupture diagnosis.Additionally, the usfda recommends magnetic resonance imaging (mri) surveillance with the first mri performed three years postoperatively and subsequent mris performed every two years after that.These recommendations may vary from country to country, so please provide the patient with additional guidance based on your country's current care standards.Establishment labs does not recommend closed capsulotomy for treating capsular contracture because it can cause implant rupture.Some symptoms may appear, such as lumps surrounding the implant or in the axilla, change or loss of size or shape of the breast or implant, pain, tingling, swelling, numbness, burning, or hardening of the breast.These symptoms are not specific to rupture and may also be experienced by patients who have capsular contracture.Some cases have been reported suggesting that silicone-implant leakage should be considered in the differential diagnosis of eosinophilia.The dfu also emphasizes the responsibility of the surgeon to fully inform the patient of potential risks and complications during the pre-operative consultation.Patients are provided with the document ¿motiva implants®: information for the patient,¿ accessible at ifu.Motiva.Health.Breast implants are not considered lifetime devices, and implant rupture is a risk associated with breast surgery, which can occur at any time.Literature reference: ¿a number of risk factors for rupture have been identified; the most common cause is surgical instrument damage.¿ (handel, garcía and winxtrom, 2013.Breast implant rupture: causes, incidence, clinical impact, and management.Plast.Reconstr.Surg.132: 1128.) device history record (dhr) review: a comprehensive review of the device history record (dhr) for the affected lot was completed.No deviations, non-conformances, or anomalies were identified during manufacturing.All raw materials and process parameters conformed to specified quality requirements.Trend and signal monitoring: the event has been evaluated as part of ongoing trend analysis activities within the pms program.Per the current complaint data report: no adverse or unexpected trends related to the alleged event have been identified.No further corrective or preventive actions are required at this time.Establishment labs will continue to monitor for similar events as part of routine pms surveillance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOTIVA IMPLANTS
Common Device Name
SILKSURFACE PLUS WITH QID
Manufacturer (Section D)
ESTABLISHMENT LABS S.A.
building b-25, coyol free zone
alajuela,alajuela
Manufacturer (Section G)
ESTABLISHMENT LABS S.A.
building b-25, coyol free zone
alajuela,alajuela
Manufacturer Contact
susana hidalgo
building b-25, coyol free zone
alajuela,alajuela 
8003554164
MDR Report Key23544173
Report Number3012883202-2025-01452
Device Sequence Number15773935
Product Code FTR
UDI-Device Identifier07445161002860
UDI-Public(01)07445161002860(11)210929(17)260929
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/16/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/29/2026
Device Catalogue NumberRSF-275+Q
Device Lot Number21091555
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/06/2025
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/13/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/16/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured09/29/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-