• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT VASCULAR INC. ARMADA¿; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT VASCULAR INC. ARMADA¿; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL Back to Search Results
Model Number B1060-060
Medical Device Problem Codes Material Rupture (1546); Difficult to Advance (2920)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/21/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in the common femoral artery (cfa) with heavy calcification and heavy tortuosity.The 6.0x60mm armada 35 balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) had resistance during advancement with the anatomy and ruptured during the first inflation before reaching nominal pressure.The device was prepared per instructions for use (ifu).Another abbott balloon, jade, was used to complete the procedure.There was no adverse patient effect and there was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported balloon rupture was confirmed.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar complaints from this lot.Based on the reported information and the observations from the returned analysis, the investigation determined that the reported balloon rupture appears to be related to operational context.There was no leak noted during preparation, which suggests a product quality issue did not contribute to the reported difficulties.In this case, it is likely that the balloon interacted with the heavily tortuous and heavily calcified anatomy resulting in the reported balloon rupture during inflation.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction h11- additional mfr narrative updated.Visual inspection and scanning electron microscopy (sem) analysis were performed on the returned device.The reported balloon rupture was confirmed.The reported difficulty advancing the device could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational context.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar complaints from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulty advancing the device appears to be related to operational context; however, a conclusive cause for the reported balloon rupture could not be determined.It was reported that the bdc interacted with the heavily tortuous and heavily calcification anatomy resulting in the reported difficulty advancing the device.Although sem analysis indicates the rupture may be attributed to material/processing discrepancy, per manufacturing engineering, there is no indication of material bad performance along the different manufactured lots.Per manufacturing engineering, possible factors that could contribute to balloon material ruptures include, but are not limited to, balloon damage during processing of the balloon material, inflation technique, interactions with other devices or patient anatomy.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARMADA¿
Common Device Name
CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT VASCULAR INC.
3200 lakeside drive
santa clara CA 95054 2807
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR COSTA RICA, REG # 3009564766
52 calle 3 b31 coyol free zone
el coyol alajuela UNK
CS   UNK
Manufacturer Contact
lindsey bell
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key23550291
Report Number2024168-2025-11523
Device Sequence Number9682970
Product Code LIT
UDI-Device Identifier08717648154706
UDI-Public(01)08717648154706(17)281130(10)50620G1
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateGA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K111899
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/16/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberB1060-060
Device Catalogue NumberB1060-060
Device Lot Number50620G1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/27/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/21/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/12/2025
02/19/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/13/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/13/2025
03/16/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/20/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight114 KG
-
-