|
|
| Catalog Number |
72201768 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Nonstandard Device (1420)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/22/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known risks with the device itself or with its use that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a ligamentoplasty, when attempted to insert and screw the biosure screw into the patient's knee.The screw broke inside the patient.All the broken parts were removed from the patient.Upon inspection, it was found that this screw did not match the screws normally used (different composition).The surgery was completed using an equivalent sn back-up device.It is unknown if there was surgical delay.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10 h3, h6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the packaging process summary found that before placing anything inside the carton, perform a 100% in-process inspection on all packaged components.Ensure the pouch label, patient label, ifu and carton label have the correct part number and lot number per the work order.Although a manufacturing record review could not be conducted due to insufficient product identification information, the root cause of the reported event has been traced to a manufacturing issue.Based on this investigation a corrective actions and a field actions were initiated to mitigate this issue.As corrective actions, all procedures related to the packaging process were reviewed and updated to performed a 100% inspection criterial of the packaging and work order label.Therefore, further corrective actions are not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|