|
ETHICON INC. PRLNE BLU 36IN 4-0 D/A RB-1; SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYPROPYLENE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
8557H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/02/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 11/17/2025.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: - please provide lot number and confirm the product code.- please elaborate on the alleged deficiency experienced with product sxpp1b450.- please clarify what did you mean by "the suture was ¿coming apart"? - provide the source or name and title of external person providing answers to follow-up (external person submitting answers to sales rep).The following information was reported: was surgery delayed due to the reported event? yes, if yes, number of minutes: 15, was procedure successfully completed? yes, were fragments generated? yes, if yes, were they removed easily without additional intervention? no, patient status/ outcome / consequences: no, was other medical intervention (e.G.X-rays, additional procedures, prescriptions, otc, revision) required: yes, is the patient part of a clinical study: unknown, to date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2025 and suture was used.A chief physician (b)(6), a highly experienced vascular surgeon, used our suture to suture an open aorta.During the suture, the needle broke in the reinforcement zone.The needle was recovered.Unfortunately, no batch number is available.There were no patient consequences reported.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: d9, h3, h6.Investigation summary: the product received for analysis was 8557h.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A failed suture needle, labeled as (b)(4), was submitted to herrera, stafford and associates, llc (hsa) for fractographic evaluation.The component was identified as product code 8557h.It was requested that hsa assess the fracture mode of the failure.A fracture was observed at the suture attachment of the needle.One side of the needle was received, the mating fracture surface was not provided for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of (b)(4) revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.This was a ductile fracture.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.The device lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|