|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 11/20/2025.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: d9, h3, h6.B01 investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.Four suture pieces were received for analysis.Product code j310h.During the initial inspection of the sample, no breakage suture was observed.Even though the extremes were noted to be cut, these were likely caused by a surgical instrument.Furthermore, body fluids were noted along the length of the suture pieces.This product code j310h contains an absorbable suture.Since the sample was received open, the functional test could not be performed due to undetermined exposure time to the environment.As per the condition of the returned sample, the functional test could not be performed.No conclusion could be reached as to what may have caused the reported incident.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.B03 investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.One open box with thirty (30) representative unopened samples received for analysis.Product code j310h.The complaint sample was not received for evaluation.Upon initial inspection of the samples, no external damage was observed on the external packets.Following the sampling plan, a visual inspection was conducted on thirteen (13) samples.The packets were open, and the swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The sutures were dispensed without problems and examined along the strand to detect any issue related to the customer complaint and no defects were observed during evaluation.A functional test was performed using instron equipment and tensile force was above the minimum requirements.The event described could not be confirmed as the device performed without any defect noted.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The event described could not be confirmed as no product defect was identified, there may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that could not be replicated during the laboratory analysis.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|