|
The investigation determined that higher than expected vitros creatinine (crea) results were obtained from a single patient sample when tested on a vitros 4600 chemistry system and a vitros 250 chemistry system.The results were higher than expected when compared to results obtained from processing the same patient sample on an alternate, unknown method.The assignable cause for the issue is creatine interference in the samples.The patient was confirmed to be taking a daily creatine supplement, however the concentration of creatine in the supplement was not provided upon request.Per the vitros crea instructions for use (ifu), limitations of the procedure, known interferences: creatine: "at a creatinine (serum and plasma) concentration of 1.5 mg/dl, creatine greater than 8 mg/dl will be flagged with a dp code (because highly elevated creatine concentrations may cause excessive background density).At a creatinine concentration of 14 mg/dl, creatine greater than 1 mg/dl will be flagged with a dp code." the vitros 4600 chemistry system (j1) did not generate vitros crea results when the patient sample was tested undiluted and with the 1:3 dilution due to the occurrence of either an "er" or "dp" sample code, which indicates computational error or substrate depletion, respectfully.The most likely cause of the er and dp sample codes is an interferent in the sample, such a creatine, which would be diluted out with the sample dilution prior to repeat testing.Per the vitros flags and codes on reports, the description for a dp sample code is substrate depletion, and the suggested action is to dilute the sample and repeat the test.The higher-than-expected vitros crea results were obtained from 5x dilutions of the sample.Historical quality control (qc) results were acceptable, indicating vitros crea slide lot 1545-3576-3187 did not likely contribute to the event.Additionally, continual tracking and trending of complaints has not identified any signals that would point to a potential systemic issue with vitros crea slide lot: 1545-3576-3187.An instrument issue is an unlikely contributor to the event as diagnostic precision testing around the time of the event obtained indicates acceptable performance of the vitros 4600 chemistry system.Additionally, there was no evidence that the vitros 250 chemistry system malfunctioned, as results were repeatable for the patient sample between the two analyzers.Pre-analytical sample processing is not a likely contributing factor to the event as the higher-than-expected vitros crea results were isolated to only the affected patient sample and the results were reproducible on the two vitros systems.
|