|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. FF FLEX RVRS CRVD INSTR; SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
72205677 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Failure to Fire (2610)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/31/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference case-(b)(4).H11 h3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known risks with the device itself or with its use that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during a meniscus repair surgery, the suture attached to the t2 of one (1) fast-fix flex became tangled and could not be deployed.The procedure was resumed, after a 5 minute delay, using an equivalent s+n back-up.Additional anesthesia was not required as consequence of the surgical prolongation.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: h3, h6: part of the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection revealed the device was not returned with any original packaging.The t1 was returned on a partial suture that is frayed and twisted.The t2 has been cut from the suture and was not returned.A second partial suture was returned.The insertion device has no visible defect.Bio debris is present.A functional evaluation was performed on the returned device and found the actuator will cycle as intended.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The root cause could not be determined since the reported malfunction could not be duplicated during the investigation.Factors that can contribute to the reported event include failure to fully actuate the device during implantation.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|