|
Device technical analysis: visual inspection of the returned lead extension revealed that the lead extension tail cables were broken from the lead extension connector.Additionally, the lead extension tails were separated from the y-boot approximately 12 cm from the proximal end.The cables are exposed at the damaged sections of the lead extension.It appears that excessive mechanical force was applied to the lead extension tails and connector during the patients accident, resulting in cable fractures, high impedances, and the reported loss of therapy.Device history record review: a review of the manufacturing records associated with this device indicated that it was successfully processed according to requirements.The dhr did not identify any manufacturing process-related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during production that could have caused or contributed to this event.The dhr review ensures each device meets required specifications and associated testing prior to release for distribution/sale.Labeling review: a labelling review was performed, and it did not reveal any anomalies.The labeling appropriately states that failure or malfunction of any device component, including, but not limited to, lead or extension breakage, hardware malfunction, loose connections, electrical shorts, or open circuits may result in a loss of adequate stimulation.Such loss of therapeutic effect can lead to the recurrence of motor symptoms, including postural instability, gait disturbances, tremor, dystonia, dyskinesias, and falls.These events may necessitate device explantation or reimplantation and are recognized risks associated with deep brain stimulation (dbs) therapy, as documented in the instructions for use (ifu).Investigation conclusion based on the available evidence, the reported occurrence of high impedances and loss of stimulation was confirmed.Visual inspection revealed that the lead extension exhibited significant external mechanical damage, including fractures of the lead extension tail cables at the connector and separation of the tails from the y boot.The damage pattern is consistent with excessive mechanical force during the patients football accident, resulting in cable fractures and subsequently causing the high impedances and loss of stimulation.The dhr confirmed the device met specifications and no manufacturing issues that could have caused the event were identified.Although the reported event is a known risk with the use of dbs, it was reported that the loss of therapy occurred after the patient had an accident playing football, therefore the most likely root cause is an unintended use error caused or contributed to this event.A risk review of the dbs 2x8 extension 95cm sterile kit was completed and confirmed that the event of loss/no stimulation was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.
|