|
Section a4, patient weight: unknown/not provided.Section a5, ethnicity: unknown/not provided.Section a6, race: unknown/not provided.Section d6b, if explanted, give date: unknown, not provided.Section h3, device evaluated by manufacturer: the device has not been returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain the missing information.However, to date, it has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: nov 20, 2025.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received.The lens was visually inspected under magnification revealing that the lens was cut in half and coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned and inspected, and no issues were identified.During the product evaluation it was confirmed that the physical characteristics of the lens matched a zcu model lens.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|