|
(b)(4).Updated sections: b4,b5,d4 lot#, exp date, udi#,d9,g3,g6,h2,h3,h6,h11.The device was returned to the factory for evaluation on 12/18/2025.An investigation was conducted on 12/22/2025.A visual inspection was conducted.Signs of clinical use and no evidence of blood was observed.There were no visual defects observed on the intact cable.A mechanical evaluation was conducted using a reference adaptor, power supply and hemopro 2 device.The cable was able to be connected to the adaptor with no physical or visual difficulties.The reference harvesting device was attached to the cable with no physical or visual difficulties observed.An electrical evaluation was conducted.A pre-cautery test was performed per the instruction for use (ifu) with a reference hemopro 2 evh tool, reference adapter and reference power supply set at level 3.0.The device passed the pre-cautery test.The power supply emitted an audible beeping sound and the evh reference tool produced steam and heat.An activation and transection capability test was performed over four (4) repetitions using "max life test method.The reference device successfully transected tissue four (4) times.Based on the returned condition of the device and the results of the evaluation, the reported failure "electrical /electronic property problem" was not confirmed.The reported device is an oem device.The certificate of conformance was reviewed for the lot #12411138.The vendor certifies that this device lot # conforms to all applicable product specifications and there were no non-conformances identified for the manufacturing batch.
|
|
The hospital reported that during an endoscopic vein harvesting procedure, the defective hemopro2 extension cable was swapped out for a new one as the cautery functionality was compromised, it was restored once the defective cable was swapped.There was no delay.There was no patient harm.
|