|
The investigation determined that a discordant, higher than expected vitros creatinine (crea) result was obtained from a single patient sample processed using vitros xt chemistry products urea-crea slides lot: 7221-0020-2434 on a vitros xt 7600 integrated system.The result was discordant when compared to the result from the same sample using a non-vitros siemens atellica method.A definitive assignable cause of the event could not be determined.Based on historical quality control results a vitros xt urea-crea lot: 7221-0020-2434 related issue is not a likely contributing factor of the event.Furthermore, continual tracking and trending of complaint data has not identified any signals to suggest there is a systemic quality issue with vitros xt urea-crea reagent lot: 7221-0020-2434.As no precision testing was performed on the vitros xt 7600 integrated system an instrument related issue could not be completely ruled out as a contributor of the event.However, historical qc results were within expectations indicating that an instrument related issue was not a likely contributing factor of the event.In addition, pre-analytical sample processing could not be ruled out as a contributing factor as it is unknown if the customer was following the sample collection device manufacturer's recommended centrifugation protocol.Improper pre-analytical sample handling could have contributed to the event.It is possible that cellular debris, due to poor sample preparation, was present in the affected sample, although this could not be confirmed.No information about the patient's condition or any medications or supplements being taken by the patient were provided upon request.Therefore, an interferent that affects the vitros method and not the non-vitros method cannot be confirmed or ruled out as a contributor of the event.Per a medical consult with an ortho medical safety officer on 17 november 2025: a patient's management may differ depending on their clinical history.If the patient had some degree of renal impairment, they may have persistently elevated crea above the normal reference range.Thus, both crea levels may not have similar clinical interpretation since a result of 2.21 mg/dl may represent an acute on chronic renal failure, while a baseline of 1.42 mg/dl result would be considered a stable chronic renal failure.Patient management for both are different.However, considering that the patient's treatment was not altered, no serious patient injury is expected.
|
|
A customer contacted the ortho clinical diagnostics (ortho) technical solution center (tsc) to report a discordant, higher than expected vitros creatinine (crea) result was obtained from a single patient sample processed using vitros xt chemistry products urea-crea slides lot: 7221-0020-2434 on a vitros xt 7600 integrated system.The result was discordant when compared to the result from the same sample using a non-vitros siemens atellica method.Patient sample vitros crea result of 2.21 mg/dl vs an expected result of 1.42 mg/dl biased results of the magnitude and direction observed may lead to inappropriate physician action if they were to occur undetected.The discordant, higher than expected vitros crea result was not reported outside of the laboratory.There was no allegation of patient harm as a result of this event.This report corresponds to ortho clinical diagnostics inc (ortho) complaint number (b)(4).
|