| Catalog Number |
20-280 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Peeled/Delaminated (1454); Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
04/22/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device history record has been completed.No deviations or non-conformances noted.Further information from the reporter regarding event, product, or patient details has been requested.No additional information is available at this time.Reason for reoperation: rupture.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "rupture".This record is for the right side.Device remains implanted.Device will be returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device has been explanted and replaced.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional, changed, and/or corrected data: b5, d6b, h6.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "rupture".Later healthcare professional reported "delamination".This record is for the right side.The device was explanted and replaced.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional, changed, and/or corrected data: b5, d9, h3, h6 device evaluation: per the analysis performed, the assessments of the complaints and any potential manufacturing issue are displayed along with any further actions required: ¿ rupture: not observed through visual inspection.¿ delamination: not observed through visual inspection.A workmanship was observed through [visual] inspection not related to the complaint for a (observed split (ss) in patch area,) event.A further investigation is requested.None of the other observations performed during the device analysis (deformation and wear abrasion) are found to be potentially related to the manufacturing process, and, therefore, no further actions are required for these observations.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Further investigation: the review of the documentation associated to the manufacturing process indicates that all devices involved in this work order were released in accordance with abbvie¿s procedures and were no defects/problems/issues found in the documents or in the personnel training related to the reported event.Additionally, no er/ ncr(s) were identified during the investigation associated with this lot and the complaint.According to the device analysis performed in the laboratory was observed split in patch area (ss), it is out of specification per qa (b)(4).The events of rupture and delamination were not observed, and the workmanship has not relation to reported complaint.Therefore, the reported events were not confirmed.A review of the current risk documents pfmea-silicone filled bi and sizer assembly, smooth rev.3.0 was performed, and the event of split in patch is a known event, for which current process controls and inspections are established to reduce the incidence of this defect.Considering that there is no adverse trend for this type of event, no additional actions are deemed required at this time.The issue with split in patch will continue to be monitored and corrective actions will be taken in the future if deemed appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "rupture".Later healthcare professional reported "delamination".This record is for the right side.The device was explanted and replaced.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|