| Model Number |
D151 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem (1573); Low impedance (2285)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Cardiac Arrest (1762); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/10/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Death
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) and non boston scientific right ventricular (rv) lead displayed a code 1004 which is indicative of a short circuit condition was detected during shock delivery, in addition to shock impedance measurements of less than 20 ohms.Subsequent shocks were aborted due to high voltage detected on the lead.Ultimately, this patient expired.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If pertinent information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) and non-boston scientific right ventricular (rv) lead displayed a code 1004 which is indicative of a short circuit condition was detected during shock delivery, in addition to shock impedance measurements of less than 20 ohms.Subsequent shocks were aborted due to high voltage detected on the lead.Ultimately, this patient expired.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause linked to device but unable to trace more specifically.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause linked to device but unable to trace more specifically.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) and non boston scientific right ventricular (rv) lead displayed a code 1004 which is indicative of a short circuit condition was detected during shock delivery, in addition to shock impedance measurements of less than 20 ohms.Subsequent shocks were aborted due to high voltage detected on the lead.Ultimately, this patient expired.Additional information was received that this patient expired due to probable sudden cardiac death and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, as listed on the death certification.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) and non boston scientific right ventricular (rv) lead displayed a code 1004 which is indicative of a short circuit condition was detected during shock delivery, in addition to shock impedance measurements of less than 20 ohms.Subsequent shocks were aborted due to high voltage detected on the lead.Ultimately, this patient expired.Additional information was received that this patient expired due to probable sudden cardiac death and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, as listed on the death certification.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device technical analysis: this product has not been returned to boston scientific and physical analysis could not be conducted.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.Labeling review: review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.Investigation conclusion: based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause not established.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause linked to device but unable to trace more specifically.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|