| Model Number |
AR40M |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/28/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the non-preloaded intraocular lens (iol) haptic was detached after implantation inside the patient's eye.As a result, the iol was removed during the same procedure.No medical or surgical interventions were performed.The patient is well and awaiting a new date to implant the new lens.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a2, a3b, a4, and a5: unknown, as information was requested but not provided.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: n/a, as lens was removed during the same procedure.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: n/a, as lens was removed during the same procedure.Section e1 - telephone number:(b)(6).Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of this review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the customer provided a photograph that was evaluated.The photograph displayed the suspect lens and a haptic was observed to be detached.Due to no product received, no further evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue "haptic detached" was identified during photograph evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information:
section d9 - device available for evaluation? yes
section d9 - date returned to manufacturer:(b)(6), 2026
section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes
device evaluation:
visual inspection revealed that the lens was cut.One haptic was damaged and broken off, with a portion of the haptic remaining inside the radial hole.Since a portion of the haptic remains inside the radial hole, the haptic was damaged and not detached.No further issues were identified.The complaint issue "haptic detached" was not identified during product evaluation.The observed "haptic damaged" is similar to the reported complaint issue.However, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion:
based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be found.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|