• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS SIMPLICITY; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS SIMPLICITY; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DRN00V
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/10/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a3a, a3b, a4, a5, a6, patient information: unknown/not provided.Section d6a, if implanted, give date: not applicable as the iol was removed and replaced during the same procedure.Section d6b, if explanted, give date: not applicable as the iol was removed and replaced during the same procedure.Therefore, not explanted.Section h3, device evaluated by manufacturer: the device has not been returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt was made to obtain the missing information.However, it was not provided.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the haptic on the preloaded johnson and johnson (jnj) intraocular lens (iol) was damaged.The haptic was not damaged during the procedure, the device seemed to have been bent in the package.The doctor inspected the device under a microscope and noticed the damage prior to any patient contact.Therefore, the device did not work as intended.The procedure was successfully completed with a backup lens of the same model.There were no other complications.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: jan 5, 2026.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received.The simplicity was visually inspected under magnification revealing that the lens was stuck inside the cartridge creating a bulge in the cartridge.The plunger rod was observed to be bent inside the cartridge.This damage is consistent with excessive force being used during advancement, after the lens became stuck in the cartridge.Ovd was observed inside the cartridge.The lens module and handpiece were inspected, and no issues were identified.The lens could not be removed from the cartridge for further evaluation.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key23640599
Report Number3012236936-2025-000312
Device Sequence Number15903989
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474810570
UDI-Public(01)05050474810570(17)280219
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/28/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDRN00V
Device Catalogue NumberDRN00V0105
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/12/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/21/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/24/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/27/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/19/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-