• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC ARROW ULTRAFLEX IAB: 7.5FR 40CC; SYSTEM, BALLOON, INTRA-AORTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC ARROW ULTRAFLEX IAB: 7.5FR 40CC; SYSTEM, BALLOON, INTRA-AORTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IAB-06840-U
Medical Device Problem Code Device Alarm System (1012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/19/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported "after the catheter into the patient, the pump alarmed helium loss alarm.After the balloon was withdrawn, it was found that the front end of the balloon was folding".Additional information states that the iab catheter was replaced into the same insertion site.No patient injury or consequence reported.The patient's current condition is reported as "fine".
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Returned for investigation was a 40cc 7.5fr ultraflex intraaortic balloon catheter (iabc) without the original packaging box.The sample was returned in a cardboard box and was in a ziploc bag.Upon return, the one-way valve was tethered to the short driveline tubing.The bladder was fully unwrapped.A kink to the central lumen was noted approximately 36cm from the iabc distal tip.The central lumen was noted broken at approximately 5.1cm from the iab distal tip.No blood was noted on the exterior surfaces of the returned sample.No obvious blood was noted within the helium pathway; the catheter was likely cleaned prior to return.The one-way valve was tested and passed.A vacuum was pulled on the one-way valve, and it held for at least 1 minute according to quality system document.An attempt to aspirate and flush the iabc central lumen using a 60cc lab- nventory syringe was unable to be successfully completed.Upon aspiration, water was unable to be consistently pulled into the syringe.The attempt to flush resulted in bladder inflation, indicating a crossover leak between the iabc helium pathway and iabc central lumen.The iabc was leak tested in accordance with testing methods from manufacturing procedure.A leak was immediately detected from the iabc distal tip and iabc luer end.The lea k from the iabc distal tip and iabc luer end are consistent with the previously confirmed broken central lumen.The iabc was leak tested again with the iabc distal tip and luer end blocked off; no other leaks were detected.A lab inventory 0.025in guidewire was back loaded through iabc distal tip.The guidewire met resistance and could not advance at approximately 5.1cm from the iabc distal tip, which is the location of the previously noted broken central lumen.No blood or debris was noted.The guidewire was front loaded through the iabc luer.The guidewire met resistance and could not advance at approximately 77cm from the iabc luer; which is the location of the previously noted broken central lumen.No blood or debris was noted on the guidewire.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted for the lot number/serial number with no relevant findings.The device passed all manufacturing specifications prior to release.The reported complaint for "the pump alarmed helium loss alarm" is confirmed.During the investigation, the intraaortic balloon catheter (iabc) central lumen was noted broken near the iabc distal tip, which can cause the reported alarm.Based on a review of the device history record (dhr), the product met specification upon release; however, the specifications were not met during the complaint investigation due to the broken central lumen.The root cause of the complaint is undetermined.No further action required at this time.This will be monitored for any developing trends.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported "after the catheter into the patient, the pump alarmed helium loss alarm.After the balloon was withdrawn, it was found that the front end of the balloon was folding".Additional information states that the iab catheter was replaced into the same insertion site.No patient injury or consequence reported.The patient's current condition is reported as "fine".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARROW ULTRAFLEX IAB: 7.5FR 40CC
Common Device Name
SYSTEM, BALLOON, INTRA-AORTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC
morrisville NC
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
16 elizabeth drive
chelmsford MA 01824
Manufacturer Contact
sachin sony
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville, NC 27560
MDR Report Key23644873
Report Number3010532612-2025-01176
Device Sequence Number9829346
Product Code DSP
UDI-Device Identifier00801902026804
UDI-Public(01)00801902026804(11)240710(17)260630(10)18F24F0084(21)
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K000729
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/29/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Expiration Date06/30/2026
Device Catalogue NumberIAB-06840-U
Device Lot Number18F24F0084
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/29/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/23/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/25/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/30/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/10/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-