| Model Number |
SY60WF |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Keratitis (1944); Blurred Vision (2137); Visual Disturbances (2140); Eye Pain (4467); Eye Irritation (4803)
|
| Date of Event |
07/07/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A non-healthcare professional reported that following the cataract surgery with intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure the patient experienced major vision problems as vision was not as expected.The eye remained tender after months, and patient can no longer drive at night because of blinding halos from headlights.The surgeon had no solution.The patient had scheduled for 2nd opinion with another physician.The patient also want to know if there was lens defect.Additional information had been received and stated on (b)(6) 2025 the patient was one day post-op after cataract surgery.The eye looked great and the wound was well closed.The lens was centered, clear and there was very little inflammation, within normal limits for day one.The surgeon counseled the patient about correct drop usage and asked the patient to call immediately for pain, redness, loss of vision or any other signs of problems.On the same day the patient complains of lots of pain in right eye after surgery.The patient called and was told to take off patch and use combo drop and refresh preservative-free tears in between, took acetaminophen.Pain much better.The patient did not use oral drop at home on the same morning.The patient experienced cornea superficial punctate keratitis (spk).On (b)(6) 2025 post operative follow-up examination, the eye looked great and healing was very well.The wound was closed and well sealed.Intraocular inflammation was very low within normal limits for one week.The patient was instructed on proper eyedrop usage.The patient had no complaints of pain or discomfort.The patient did not use oral drop.The patient states she tapered drops as directed and she had completed as suggested.The patient states occasionally she gets pressure or tight feeling behind right eye.The patient was on company artificial tears drops.The patient was also taking corticosteroid, antibiotic and anti-inflammatory medicine.The patient eye was checked and the patient reported that vision loss (reported as blurry vision).The patient states visual disturbance and reader gave her migraine.On (b)(6) 2025, the patient was two months post-cataract surgery.The eye looked very good with no intraocular inflammation.Lens implant was clear and well-centered.Overall, the results were very good.The patient was counseled about outcomes and instructed about expectations.Long discussion with patient about over-the-counter (otc) reader reader vs prescription glasses.The patient wanted to use otc readers.The patient had no complaints of pain or discomfort.The patient states vision was good since surgery.Tapered drops as directed.On (b)(6) 2025 the patient complaints of sporadic pain about 6-8 times over last 3 months, lasts minutes to hours.It has been scratchy.It did not feel like foreign body, more like a stabbing in the back of the eye.There was no pattern but had been since the week of cataract extraction.The patient also reports persistent soreness and has been unable to wear makeup due to discomfort.The patient had been using artificial tears.The patient also experienced dry eye after surgery which was related superficial punctate keratitis (spk).The patient was experiencing blurry vision in the right eye.The patient reports vision has gotten worse over the past 6-12 months.The patient reports increased blurriness at both distance and near vision, requiring more light for reading.The patient also states greater difficulty with fine print, heightened glare sensitivity, and the presence of halos and starbursts around headlights and streetlamps.The patient was recommended to use artificial tear and preservative-free eye ointment at bedtime.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A product was not returned for analysis.A device history record review and a non-conformance review of the reported lot number was conducted.The deviation review did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.Root cause has not been identified.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received and stated that, the patient ended up cancelling the appointment.The physician had decided to refer to a cornea specialist.The cornea specialist started on steroid drops and thinks patient eye might still have had scratches in it, nurse mentioned that scratches could cause the halos, which the patient experiencing at night.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Information was provided by the surgeon that the patient's issues are related to dry eye and not to the lens.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The account indicated the use of qualified associated products.Information was provided by the surgeon that the patient's issues are related to dry eye and not to the lens.Additional information was provided that the patient was referred to a cornea specialist and was prescribed steroid drops.Each lens is subjected to a 100% assessment of the power and optical resolution during the manufacturing process in order to determine acceptability per the lens model and diopter.It was reported that the patient had pre-existing pinguecula in addition to the mature white cataract.No additional information has been provided at this time.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional clarification received and stated that the patient issues are due to dry eye and spk which occurred after surgery.The reported issues are unrelated to the iol.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|