|
Reported event: an event regarding instability involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review with clinical consultant indicated "conclusion/assessment: no medical records, patient history, sequential x-rays or exams were provided for review.Based on the pi report and unlabeled/undated x-rays, a patient had a tka in 2022.They complained of the knee feeling loose after some undisclosed chiropractic treatment.There was suspicion of a pcl tear but the reasoning for this was not provided.A revision was performed (no record of the procedure specifics) (b)(6) 2025.Event confirmation: a ¿loose knee¿, tearing of the pcl, and/or revision knee surgery cannot be confirmed with the materials provided for review.Root cause: the root cause of the revision would be knee instability, the presumed reason for the instability would be pcl disruption and/or trauma from chiropractic treatment.But these events were not confirmed therefore a root cause cannot be ascribed." product history review: review of the product history records indicate the reported device was manufactured with no reported relevant discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: a review with clinical consultant indicated "conclusion/assessment: no medical records, patient history, sequential x-rays or exams were provided for review.Based on the pi report and unlabeled/undated x-rays, a patient had a tka in 2022.They complained of the knee feeling loose after some undisclosed chiropractic treatment.There was suspicion of a pcl tear but the reasoning for this was not provided.A revision was performed (no record of the procedure specifics) (b)(6) 2025.Event confirmation: a ¿loose knee¿, tearing of the pcl, and/or revision knee surgery cannot be confirmed with the materials provided for review.Root cause: the root cause of the revision would be knee instability, the presumed reason for the instability would be pcl disruption and/or trauma from chiropractic treatment.But these events were not confirmed therefore a root cause cannot be ascribed." further information such as return of the device, pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|