• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PT. CIBA VISION BATAM ACRYSOF MULTIPIECE IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PT. CIBA VISION BATAM ACRYSOF MULTIPIECE IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number MA60AC
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 11/07/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A product was not returned for analysis.Complaint history and product history records were reviewed and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.Root cause has not been identified.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
A non health care professional reported that during intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, the haptic of the lens was fractured.So it was not implanted.Additional information has been requested.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information has been provided in d.9., h.3., h.6., and h.11.The lens was returned taped inside a small plastic container.A small amount of solution was observed on the lens.One haptic was broken with a portion retained in the haptic insertion area.The haptic insertion area had a small crack.The lens was cleaned with klrp for further evaluation.The optic had two narrow, angled scratches on opposite sides of the posterior surface.Two short, narrow angled scratches were observed on the anterior surface.These scratches were similar in appearance to damage caused by an instrument used to grasp the lens.A device history record review and a non-conformance review of the reported lot number was conducted.The deviation review did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.Associated products were not provided.It is unknown if qualified associated products were used.The company lens is only qualified for use with the company cartridge.The reported haptic damage was observed.Optic damage was also observed.All lenses are 100% inspected for cosmetic attributes and the damage exhibited by the returned complaint sample would not have met company release criteria.Based on the observation, it is concluded that the damage is not manufacturing related.Due to the presence of surgical solution and the condition of the returned sample, the damage is most likely related to customer handling.It is unknown if qualified associated products were used.The company lens is only qualified for use with the company cartridge.The ifu (instructions for use): company foldable iol (intraocular lens) are qualified for use with a company qualified delivery system (handpiece and cartridge) and ophthalmic viscosurgical device (ovd) combination.The ifu instructs that a company qualified delivery system and viscoelastic combination should be used.The use of an unqualified combination may cause damage to the lens and potential complications during the implantation process.The ifu instructs: use holding forceps to grasp the lens by the optic edge and gently place the lens anterior side up into the back of the ovd-filled cartridge.The lens should be inserted until it is centered with or slightly past the outline etched into the top of the cartridge.The trailing haptic will extend from the proximal end of the cartridge.Position the trailing haptic to the left of the haptic post as shown in the detailed view.This will allow the plunger to go past the haptic during the initial advancement of the plunger into the cartridge.Verify the lens is positioned on the bottom surface of the cartridge.The haptic should be maintained to the left of the post when the lens is loaded correctly.Accurate positioning of the lens will decrease the potential for optic and haptic damage.Haptic manufacturing is a validated process with multiple inspections to verify the quality of the produced haptic material.These inspections include a verification of the dimensional accuracy, tensile strength, flexibility and cosmetic appearance.The inspections ensure that the material meets all required specifications before it is allocated for use.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACRYSOF MULTIPIECE IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
PT. CIBA VISION BATAM
beringin kav. #204 batamindo
industrial park muka kuning
pulau batam 29433
ID  29433
Manufacturer (Section G)
PT. CIBA VISION BATAM
beringin kav. #204 batamindo
industrial park muka kuning
pulau batam 29433
ID   29433
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schlech
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8007579780
MDR Report Key23713555
Report Number9681121-2025-00179
Device Sequence Number21433007
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier00380652552585
UDI-Public(01)00380652552585(17)290525(11)240527(10)31574317
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCO
PMA/510(K) Number
P930014
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/19/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberMA60AC
Device Catalogue NumberMA60AC.230
Device Lot Number31574317
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/11/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/26/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/04/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/19/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/27/2024
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-