• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SONOVA AG PHONAK AUDEO P90-RL; HEARING AID, AIR-CONDUCTION, RECEIVER-IN-CANAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SONOVA AG PHONAK AUDEO P90-RL; HEARING AID, AIR-CONDUCTION, RECEIVER-IN-CANAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 050-0773
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer conducted a follow up with the initial reporter to gather more information on the incident.The hcp reported that the patient needed to be seen at urgent care for a cerustop wax guard in his left ear canal.Wife is a retired rn so she has an otoscope at home but was unable to get it out.The hcp reports cshells did not retain wax guard from the initial fitting.It first happened in the hcps office and the cp was able to remove it and instructed the patient to press down on the wax guard when inserting a new one to be sure it is in the cshell all the way.The patient did not suffer any medical symptoms in the course of this event.The patient has recovered and continues to wear the current his and cshells but was advised not to use the wax guards in the current molds.Yes.Audiologist ordered new cshell molds.Affected left cshell sn: (b)(6).The manufacturer has checked the modelling files of the custom-made earpiece (cshell) subject to this incident and confirms the modelling was done according to the order of the hcp.There were no issues identified with how the tip of the shell was design in regard to the placement of the cerustop waxguard.Manufacturer confirms that cerustop wax guard is a detachable part by design.Its function is to protect the receiver from earwax and debris accumulation.Cerumen filers need to be replaced regularly to prevent acoustic sound deterioration.An applicable risk on the detachable parts of the device remaining in the ear canal is present in the risk assessment of this device.Risk control measures, including appropriate warning in the user guide, are implemented.The user guide also contain a dedicated instruction on the filter replacement method.The manufacturer checked service records.There were no services to these devices prior to this event.The manufacturer checked for similar complaints in the last three years and there have been no trends identified.The manufacturer will keep observing for trends.This is the final report.
 
Event or Problem Description
It has been brought to manufacturer's attention that the hcp reported she noticed the wax guards did not go easily into the when she went to fit them with the patient.The patient ended up having to go to urgent care because the wax guard fell out and got stuck in his ear.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PHONAK AUDEO P90-RL
Common Device Name
HEARING AID, AIR-CONDUCTION, RECEIVER-IN-CANAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SONOVA AG
laubisruetistrasse 28
staefa, zurich 8712
SZ  8712
Manufacturer Contact
aleksandra enns-bray
laubistuetistrasse 28
staefa, zurich 8712
SZ   8712
MDR Report Key23714503
Report Number3005085999-2025-00041
Device Sequence Number16013662
Product Code OSM
UDI-Device Identifier07613389301113
UDI-Public(01)07613389301113
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
N/A
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 11/10/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number050-0773
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/10/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/04/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured09/03/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexMale
-
-